zombeye

- friends
1 link karma
704 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

  • dust

Reddit, a man could die for committing blasphemy. We need this story to blow up and save his life. by anonymousthrowaway96in atheism

[–]zombeye 1 point2 points ago

Certainly the Western powers (US, France, UK) have installed and supported puppet regimes throughout the Middle East.

However, assuming that withdrawing this 'support' would lead to a rosy progressive outcome is illusory.

Military dictatorships or restrictive theocracies seem more likely to emerge than any kind of progressive government if Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, etc. are any indication.

Reddit, a man could die for committing blasphemy. We need this story to blow up and save his life. by anonymousthrowaway96in atheism

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

Blasphemy laws are common, and death sentences for violating these laws are the norm throughout Islamic countries.

It sucks, and I don't have the numbers, but I suspect many people are put to death for blasphemy annually in countries with such laws.

Hey Reddit - What's one character you cannot stand from a show or movie you otherwise enjoy? by euphoniumatemydingoin AskReddit

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

Ditto for me on both of those...I forgot about Tasha Yar, I think I blocked her out on purpose. I was so pissed when they brought her back as a Romulan wtf. I cheered when that black sludge killed her.

Hey Reddit - What's one character you cannot stand from a show or movie you otherwise enjoy? by euphoniumatemydingoin AskReddit

[–]zombeye 5 points6 points ago

Yep, he really was. Lamest plot-line + worst acting ever.

Hey Reddit - What's one character you cannot stand from a show or movie you otherwise enjoy? by euphoniumatemydingoin AskReddit

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

Oh god Doctor Pulaski by a landslide. Watching her on SNG made me want to throw an ax through the TV.

I know a lot of people felt that way about Wesley Crusher but he never bugged me that much.

Will this guy shut up and take our money! by NiceGuyMikein videos

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

For impatient people who want to see the saw's operation explained you'll want to start here.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

Thanks, I will check it out.

I guess my stance is more politically/philosophically derived as opposed to practically or public-healthily. There might be some middle ground of decriminalization + easy treatment (like Portugal has taken) that would be most practical.

I put a tame atheist decal on my car last night. My tires were slashed when I woke up this morning. by ceslekin atheism

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

Welcome to the real world.

Sorry, I know it sucks. But I am often frustrated at the false sense of reality that permeates reddit. The fact is, atheists are a tiny tiny minority worldwide and in the US. And plenty of religious people would rejoice if they could somehow just kill us - as they do in other parts of the world, and was the norm for Christianity not too long ago.

It could easily swing back the other way. Christians have the numbers, they dominate our government, and almost by definition they can't be expected to see reason.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

I agree with you about obesity. But what's the solution, prohibiting snack foods? Governmental control over what people eat?

I disagree entirely with regard to responsible use of heroin and cocaine; a large percentage of people who have ever tried those drugs do not go on to become addicts and only try them or use them occasionally. That perception of danger is largely created by the anti-drug crowd, and by severe addicts.

Zinberg eventually interviewed 61 controlled opiate users. His criteria excluded both dabblers (the largest group of people who have used heroin) and daily users. One subject was a 41-year-old carpenter who had used heroin on weekends for a decade. Married 16 years, he lived with his wife and three children in a middle-class suburb. Another was a 27-year-old college student studying special education. He had used heroin two or three times a month for three years, then once a week for a year. The controlled users said they liked "the 'rush' (glow or warmth), the sense of distance from their problems, and the tranquilizing powers of the drug." Opiate use was generally seen as a social activity, and it was often combined with other forms of recreation. Summing up the lessons he learned from his research, Zinberg emphasized the importance of self-imposed rules dictating when, where, and with whom the drug would be used. More broadly, he concluded that "set and setting" -- expectations and environment -- play crucial roles in shaping a drug user's experience. link

Cocaine is in a class by itself...millions of people use it in powder form as a party drug and never become addicted.

Parenting. You're doing it right. by captainhowdy27in videos

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

It would be fun to shoot a laptop but he should've opened it up and turned it on first. And really since he'd just tuned it up he should've sold it.

Parenting. You're doing it right. by captainhowdy27in videos

[–]zombeye -1 points0 points ago

Ok, but I think it was a childish response to make a video and shoot her laptop. In my opinion he is being an idiot on the internet with his response.

I just don't see that as being a valuable lesson for a teenager. If as a parent you have to escalate things to that level with a 15 year old, it's probably because you failed to do the things you should've when they were 5.

TIL that Andrew Jackson was the only US president in history to ever pay off the national debt in full by philgein todayilearned

[–]zombeye 1 point2 points ago

Yes, I also think that judging historical figures through the lens of modernity is not sensible - every historical figure existed in the context of their day and age. But doing so surely has become the norm (possibly as a backlash to history having been taught as a sort of nationalist propaganda, which is an equally flawed approach in my opinion).

TIL that Andrew Jackson was the only US president in history to ever pay off the national debt in full by philgein todayilearned

[–]zombeye -4 points-3 points ago

I neither asserted nor implied it was false. As I said:

Perhaps you are correct; I don't know. I was responding to what was in the original article.

Parenting. You're doing it right. by captainhowdy27in videos

[–]zombeye -3 points-2 points ago

To me it seemed like a silly overreaction. Kids get frustrated and vent; posting that rant on Facebook (and hiding it) is similar to bitching to one's friends. Who doesn't have a bad day and complain? Particularly if their father's an overachieving hardass as that fellow seems to be.

As to "parenting done right", I would say that if his daughter is as unhappy and dissatisfied as this video implies, he's been pretty unsuccessful as a parent. There are plenty of well-adjusted, respectful teenagers out there, and by and large they got that way by parents who raised them properly.

TIL that Andrew Jackson was the only US president in history to ever pay off the national debt in full by philgein todayilearned

[–]zombeye -8 points-7 points ago

Perhaps you are correct; I don't know. I was responding to what was in the original article:

In 1802 Jackson was a general of the Tennessee militia. Jackson fought in the Creek Indian Wars, during which he wrested twenty three million acres of land from tribal peoples.

Nothing in the article corroborates your statements.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

I'm no expert, but I suspect the Opium Wars were mostly about money and sovereign control, not issues of social welfare. I don't know how widespread and problematic opium addiction became but at least from Wikipedia it seems to have been a relatively minor concern.

So you have no problem legalizing marijuana, but you are in favor of criminalizing all other recreational substances and their users, despite whether a given individual uses them responsibly or not?

But in my mind that's the whole problem - you feel marijuana's fine, but old people think it's "reefer madness" and thus criminalize it and imprison a million people a year for a decades and spend billions of dollars building a police state.

I think it's evident from alcohol prohibition first and drug prohibition more recently that the harm from prohibition far outweighs the harm resulting from allowing citizens to make their own choices regarding what substances to ingest.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 1 point2 points ago

'Heavily regulated' is a very relative term. Relative to pharmaceuticals and illegal drugs, alcohol is not heavily regulated. Relative to televisions I guess it is.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 0 points1 point ago

I don't think your stance on antibiotics is correct. I have been reading alarmist articles about it for some time but I think that's all it amounts to. Yes, some 'superbugs' develop antibiotic resistance, but these tend to emerge in clinical settings due to evolution, not misuse of antibiotics.

TIL that Andrew Jackson was the only US president in history to ever pay off the national debt in full by philgein todayilearned

[–]zombeye -9 points-8 points ago

Saying he took the land is silly. He was a general acting in accordance with US policy at the time. We might rightly criticize US policy, but singling out one general to blame because he later became president doesn't make sense.

TIL up until February 9, 1909, most drugs were readily available over the counter in the US. The Opium Exclusion Act, aimed directly at Chinese Immigrants, began a 100-year+ string of crime and violence that continues to this day. by TheCannonin todayilearned

[–]zombeye 13 points14 points ago

Why do we need 'heavy regulation'? Why can't individuals be trusted to decide for themselves what they ingest?

Alcohol is extremely addictive and kills tens of thousands of people a year - far more than all other illegal drugs combined - but we don't get up in arms about it and feel the need to regulate it more heavily.

Instead we trust most people to use it responsibly, and punish those who abuse it as needed using existing laws.

Same-sex marriage question: Polygamy? by zombeyein politics

[–]zombeye[S] 0 points1 point ago

I didn't find his argument compelling at all, nor indeed even an argument; it was just his opinion buttressed with some anecdotes and witticisms.

I don't approach this question from the stance of the 'slippery slope' evangelicals fret about, but rather from the standpoint of basic civil rights and discrimination.

Why I loved used books... by Jadler88in funny

[–]zombeye 1 point2 points ago

They do come in handy in a pinch.

Same-sex marriage question: Polygamy? by zombeyein politics

[–]zombeye[S] 0 points1 point ago

That same argument can be made about any marriage or contract, and yes, too bad so sad is my view. Caveat emptor.

NASA Medical Breakthrough that could save millions of lives - the NASA Biocapsule I by furious_stylesin science

[–]zombeye -2 points-1 points ago

Exactly. This was the clearest example of vaporware I've seen in a long time: a product that doesn't exist being lauded as the greatest thing since sliced bread.

They are scheduled to begin animal trials this year and next, and human trials would begin shortly after that.

Medical devices/pharmaceuticals need to go through major testing which takes 5-10 years, and:

Most drugs that undergo preclinical (animal) testing never even make it to human testing and review by the FDA. FDA link

Even if this thing passes - which is quite less than likely - what does it do? Deliver drugs subcutaneously? Wow, biggest thing EVAR all right!

I can't believe how overhyped that lame Gizmodo article is, nor that so many redditors are swallowing that crap hook line and sinker.

view more: next