verbify

- friends
3,683 link karma
12,970 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • One-Year Club

    Verified Email

Reddit does this shit all the time. by dreamqueen9103in TrollXChromosomes

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago

I think that was the joke.

At The Dentist (First Comic) by Philosophicaltreein treecomics

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago

Heh, we should start an Ent Pride Movement, where we 'come out of the closet'.

Don't mess with this religious commentor..... by atworkworkingin aaaaaatheismmmmmmmmmm

[–]verbify 2 points3 points ago

I recognised it immediately as Pslam 2:1-2.

I know my Bible way too well for an atheist.

US elections: Why does the world's greatest democracy offer just two choices? by TommyCollinsin TrueReddit

[–]verbify 166 points167 points ago

India is the most populous democracy in the world. Canada is the democracy with the largest landmass. Maybe by 'great' they meant 'most powerful' - the highest GDP and largest military.

Edit: For those complaining below, I was using the Democracy Index.

[03/06/2012] PUBCRAWL XIV- JUBILEE MADNESS by Mancalimein LondonSocialClub

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago

I've never been to the famed LSC pub crawls before. And this time I'm away on a stag. Dammit!

Ex-Hassidic rapper comes out by ElishaBenAbuyahin exjew

[–]verbify 0 points1 point ago

I think you just wrote 'you're' twice. x

Ex-Hassidic rapper comes out by ElishaBenAbuyahin exjew

[–]verbify 0 points1 point ago

That doesn't even make sense.

Ex-Hassidic rapper comes out by ElishaBenAbuyahin exjew

[–]verbify 0 points1 point ago

You're the more detailed article.

Other than being corny, did I do something wrong? by shallergyin OkCupid

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago

You were fine. It was absolutely appropriate for you to assume she was making a reference to the book. She didn't get your reference and then she was impolite about it by blaming you. Keep calm and carry on.

What hard truth does Reddit need to hear? by TheJungleVIPin AskReddit

[–]verbify 11 points12 points ago

Self referential posts aren't that funny. Including this one.

What Jesus said about homosexuality by Megapigeonin atheism

[–]verbify 42 points43 points ago*

The Old Testament isn't the only homophobic part of the Bible - Epistle to the Romans 1 26-27:

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

These posts always confuses me - I have no idea what they have to do with Atheism. It has a fair bit to do with LGBT rights, and there is a subreddit for that. Almost every day there is either a post about how some religious people are homophobic or about how some religious person isn't homophobic (sometimes titled 'this religious person got it right' - a weird post for a subreddit that is supposed to be dedicated to atheism) or this kind post. Incidentally Stephen Colbert is Catholic.

It isn't that I particularly mind LGBT posts. I agree that there's an argument to be made that many religious holy texts are homophobic (and racist and pro-slavery and silent on child abuse - I could go on), and therefore given the religions that most of us encounter, there is some crossover between discussions of homophobia and atheism. Therefore they are sometimes relevant to this subreddit as a critique on religion (although the above post is hardly a critique on religion)..

I also think it's nice that so many people on Reddit express solidarity with people who are so often discriminated against. Many people live in areas where not many people around them recognise LGBT rights - and therefore the internet is the one place they can go for solidarity. It's positively heartwarming.

But there's a part of me that thinks 'this belongs in /r/christianity or /r/lgbt or in /r/ainbow' (incidentally currently the top post in /r/christianity is this). I sign up for /r/atheism in order to have discussions about atheism.

And then I wonder why this takes place. I'm confused about this. Perhaps it is because it's about religion, and therefore people don't notice the 'a' in front of atheism. Maybe people think atheism is about being against religious bigots, not about questioning religion itself. But whatever it is, I can't see for the life of me how it belongs in /r/atheism .

Edit: I'd prefer discussions about atheist existentialism, secular humanism, or about the various arguments for or against the existence of god. It's not that I dislike these posts, I just think they drown out other discussion. And I just realised I'm the guy who raises a point of order about this belonging in the wrong subreddit.

The younger years by cronoizmin funny

[–]verbify 3 points4 points ago

Hipster memes were memes before they were memes.

Unlikely Love by citrustarin pics

[–]verbify 5 points6 points ago*

Israeli-Arab parties:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%27al

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_List

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balad_(political_party)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadash (A Jewish and Arab party, with three Arab members of Knesset and one Jewish member. The Israeli Labor Party also has an Arab member of Knesset.)

There is a reserved seat for Jews in the Iranian Parliament, so silentao wasn't being entirely straightforward.

100s of pies stolen from New Zealand bakery (x-post from /r/newzealand) by xlevusin worldnews

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago

We should not discount the possible involvement of blackbirds.

Handsome! by webby_mc_webbersonin funny

[–]verbify 0 points1 point ago

There is a pun in the title.

How do I respond? by Death_Rampsin exjew

[–]verbify 1 point2 points ago*

He/She should have the courtesy to read an article you post before commenting on it. The etymology of prejudice is from the Latin prae- (pre) and judicium (judgment) - i.e. to have a preconceived judgement. Commenting before reading is quite prejudiced.

And as to the content of the message - the person has shown the ability to justify religion whichever way the study goes - it seems to fit the definition of an ad hoc hypothesis.

Finally, Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim, 307:

“It is forbidden on Shabbat and Yom Tov to study anything besides words of Torah; even scholarly matters are forbidden. But there is an opinion that permits it”

The opinion that forbids it is generally considered to be the authoritative opinion. So if your friend is a 'True Believer', your friend shouldn't read it on Shabbos anyhow - this kind of reminds me of the posts in /r/atheism of people getting tattoos of religious Biblical verses, when the Bible forbids tattoos.

Need help with (ex)Judaism paper by uber_kittyin exjew

[–]verbify 0 points1 point ago

If you do decide to change topics, this list might be useful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Messiah_claimants

If it were me, I'd limit it to Jesus, Shimon bar Kokhba, Shabbtai Tzvi, Jacob Frank and Menachem Mendel Schneerson.

view more: next