No one else is commenting, so I thought I'd chip in my two cents. Basically, it's an easy way to burn a couple of hours if you're drunk and bored on a Friday night; otherwise, it is entirely skippable.

The first thing you'll notice is that the entire thing looks like it was shot on someone's cell phone camera. The production value is very low-budget. Also, and I believe the Geekscape article mentioned this, but the lighting leaves a lot to be desired.

The acting is "OK". Not terrible, but not great either. And the soundtrack is absolutely horrible -- although the film nearly redeemed itself by setting the final climactic battle between the heroine and the monster to Walter Murphy's "A Fifth of Beethoven".

The strongest point of the movie, in my opinion, is the gore which is, for the most part, very in-your-face (none of that "implied / off-camera violence" stuff) and fairly well done. Unfortunately, the afore-mentioned lighting issues obscure the gore at several key moments in the film and prevent it from being fully appreciated.

Other than that, there's not much I can say that wasn't already covered in the article you linked. Although, strangely, the article completely failed to mention a guest appearance by Tom "Sex Machine" Savini. (Not much of a spoiler; his name is in the opening credits!)

To recap: Check it out if you're bored and/or curious. Otherwise, in my opinion, you're not really missing anything.