few questions:

• do you have any way of checking for things like paclobutrazol and daminozide in samples?

• why do so many testing companies come up with THC / etc figures that are unbelievable, bordering on ridiculous? how does the consuming public differentiate between actual test results and marketing hype disguised as lab tests?

• do you feel that there are other factors at work in effective potency? i.e. for two samples with nearly identical % content of main actives, do you feel that other factors in the physical properties of the bud, other terpenoid content, etc has a noticeable bearing on the end effect?

• how tired are you of "OG" being tacked on to 75% of everything regardless of what it is?

• have you ever been involved or privy to testing showing issues with solvent/etc residues in solvent-extracted concentrates? i've seen and heard lots of people be concerned about this, but rarely found anyone who can back up the idea with real data. granted there are concentrates that have not been fully purged and/or properly made in the first place, but what about some of the really high quality product being pulled with butane? what solid science backs up the idea that it is worse, or even comparable to what 99% of people get when using a butane-fueled lighter? the only thing that might give me pause is the fact that all (to my knowledge?) canned butane contains rust inhibitors - but when will we get to see someone showing mass spectrometer data that proves you can't ever produce 100% clean concentrates with butane?