‘forced catheterization’

newpolitics · 11 days

Unknowable. It is unknown if Romney can win a 2 way election. It can not be determined if a third party candidacy is a leading factor of Romney's potential upset.

Also, every vote is earned.

osterander · 15 days

what if i told you that the usa was a private entity, and its owners do have private warfare. they simply swindle the tax payer and bond investors for the cash.

Edgewood_Dirk · 24 days

they sure run a tight ship. nothing gets by them....... except for trillions of dollars worth of drugs and other illegal shit.

cypherdtraitor · 24 days

Don't hate the player hate the game. with all those millions of romney supporters that are supposedly out there, why are they not showing up the meetings?

dis_connecting · 28 days

you should have told them to stop cursing in front of children

PsychoJester · 1 month

handheld

quikjl · 1 month

I'm glad you think i'm clever and that you are wrong.

lowkeyschmokey · 1 month

Its called not buying your kid a computer. Free market, bitches.

quikjl · 1 month

just some random thoughts:

If he isn't winning, what difference is it to you if he continues to waste his supporters money? You are scared that the political philosophy that he is educating people about will become popular. Why shouldn't he allow his supporters in all states get the chance to vote for him? Why should your boredom be the only definition of boredom allowed? many people are exited about his campaign.

Did you know that the first abolitionist party candidates in the united states only got 5% of the vote when running for state offices. 30 years later slavery was constitutionally banned. They changed the debate. The same can be said for the woman's suffrage party. got some votes, changed the debate, then the major parties adopted the idea into their platform to get support from those voters.

Plenty of people wanted obama to drop out in 2008 because "hillary is obviously the candidate, obama is just dividing the party".

the last death throes of a failed movement is to tell opposing views to shut up, you lost now therefore you have lost forever.

Do you really think economics is a zero sum game? Was there the same wealth in the world 10,000 years ago as there is today?

quikjl · 1 month

so now you've changed your criteria to boring AND unsuccessful. And you are choosing your own criteria for success.

12 term congressman that is a national celebrity. his son is a US senator. millions in campaign donations, millions of supporters that are now getting involved in local and state politics. Creating awareness about a political philosophy that is intentionally ignored and censored by corporate news organizations.

I also think you are threatened by the movement he started.

quikjl · 1 month

I'm bored of county music and rap music, those industries should just stop producing music.

quikjl · 1 month

why are the same people so confident that ron paul is a joke candidate also threatened by him continuing to campaign?

AyeMatey · 1 month

north korea

AyeMatey · 1 month

how about through voluntary exchanges of goods and services?

AyeMatey · 1 month

I wish we "all" decided where the money goes, but that's kinda-sorta an idealistic representation of how tax revenue is spent. There's been a lot of news about these expensive middle east adventures the last decade, for example. what we "all" define as good can be just as subjective as what an individual might define as good.

AyeMatey · 1 month

so people can voluntarily give their wealth to good causes instead of being taxed? maybe those loons in r/libertarian are on to something.

vdirequest · 1 month

If someone damaged or vandalized the billboard, or prevented me from owning a billboard, or confiscated the billboard because I own too many billboards, would you consider that a form of censorship?

Also, you did not explain why the information on the billboard is not property. You simply made the claim with out explaining.

vdirequest · 1 month

Is a billboard property or speech? It can be both.

GreatLookingGuy · 1 month

You are advocating killing those who have not harmed others simply because the "correct" paperwork is completed.

You remind me of someone living in the southern united states 100 years ago that supported the lynching of black people that looked at white women: "Its against the law for niggers to look at white women, and after a fair trial we should execute them to protect white people from the violent nigger culture".

GreatLookingGuy · 1 month

your original post claimed that people should be executed. thats pretty fucking violent. If someone wanted to execute you, would you feel threatened?

sfudman

TROPHY CASE

sfudman

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login