fauxmosexual

- friends
4,164 link karma
15,473 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • One-Year Club

    Verified Email

Moving to New Zealand to escape socialism in US and Europe by hondaaccordsin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 2 points3 points ago

If I were accidentally responsible for an American immigrant I'd never be able to live with myself.

Moving to New Zealand to escape socialism in US and Europe by hondaaccordsin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 2 points3 points ago

A dumb American migration thread and I'm entirely redundant :(

Here's an article about a completely different country. DAE hate prohibition? by fauxmosexualin NZCirclejerk

[–]fauxmosexual[S,M] 3 points4 points ago

I've reviewed fauxmosexual's post and have determined that thanks the persistence of a particular person the phenomenon of anti-prohibition links and comments being shoehorned in anywhere possible in /r/newzealand is common enough to made this topic circlejerk-worthy.

If you would like to discuss this standard further, or appeal your ban, please send a message to /r/nzcirclejerk to discuss the matter further.

Thankyou for your concern,

/r/NZCirclejerk moderation team

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

I'm sure nukethepope is a highly intelligent man of great learning, but I don't think his intelligence spreads to the people skills neccesary to help people who are questioning their faith without insulting them to the point of making them hate atheism.

And yes, most of the discourse on this subreddit could use improvement (hence this post) but if you dig deep enough there's some very interesting discussion to be had.

“When a majority is oppressing a minority, that can also involve human rights, it’s that basic notion of the discrimination against people based solely on what they choose to put in their body, rather than the harm they do to others.” by Ironic_Aliin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 0 points1 point ago

Come to believe that every other commenter on the internet is wrong, prejudiced, ignorant or untermenschen.

I didn't come to believe this, it's a self-evident fact.

Comment on any content on /r/newzealand that doesn't meet his extremely high standards.

You think that the high standards and mostly meme-free /r/newzealand just organised itself?

Cultivate an extremely supercilious haughty attitude and combine with liberal dosings of faux-outrage.

Cultivate? My good sir, my bearing is not in anyway an act or fabrication, it is simply the natural expression of higher intellect as it is threatened to be drowned by the philistinic hoi polloi.

your crowning as goddess-queen will be soon to follow.

I await my coronoation with bated breath.

Here's an article about a completely different country. DAE hate prohibition? by fauxmosexualin NZCirclejerk

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 5 points6 points ago

Allow me to present a serious counterargument to your jestful comment, because you've really struck a nerve here and I feel like my internet honour is being attacked.

on a summer frock

I do not own, borrow, or in any shape or form wear a summer frock. As a gender-atheist I don't engage in gender politics and believe that men should be men at all times. I often write to my local politician to secure legislation enshrining that into place but that doesn't mean I have views on gender.

Comment on any content on /r/newzealand that could possibly have any slight connection with anything.

I think you'll find that as my comments are written in English, one of the official languages of New Zealand, everything I say is completely relevant to /r/newzealand.

an empty H2go bottle to piss in

As a cannabis user I'm impervious to diabetes (source: /r/trees) so it's actually one of my many, many empty bottles of Mountain Dew, not H2Go.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

It wasn't a meme at all! It was a comment thread. iirc it was /u/nukethepope who was giving both barrels to someone whose beliefs he didn't like, and other /r/atheism users called him out on using stereotypes, bigotry and bad logic and he got downvoted as he threw a hissy fit. It was that moment that made me realise that /r/atheism were actually a pretty diverse bunch, and if you could make it past the loud assholes there was much to be learned.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

Probably about two years, maybe three.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

I constantly see complaints that making it a default sub downgraded the content.

I think the content is worse but the community better, but like I said in the OP I didn't stick around to see if my first impression was correct.

It's a tricky line to draw between being usefully provocative to make people think and so negative or offensive that you get ignored as a "typical devilworshipping atheist". My personal experience of the /r/atheism of two or three years ago was that it was needlessly offensive and offputting, but I suppose that's a very subjective judgement.

“When a majority is oppressing a minority, that can also involve human rights, it’s that basic notion of the discrimination against people based solely on what they choose to put in their body, rather than the harm they do to others.” by Ironic_Aliin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 0 points1 point ago

Hi, my name is fauxmosexual and I'm an addict. You might be amazed/frightened/completely unbelieving when I tell you I used to smoke even more than that when I was unemployed/student.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 1 point2 points ago

Thanks for that /r/atheismbot link, that's really cool!

My first experience was years ago, iirc /r/atheism wasn't a default subreddit. This is a very subjective view from not very much browsing, but back then although the memes and ragecomics were fewer and thought-provoking articles more frequent, the community itself seemed to have a much narrower view of what being atheist means, basically that you have to hate all Christianity. I think the frontpaging of /r/atheism has brought lots of pretty average content but it's also meant more people expressing a wider range of views.

But like I say, I was Christian at the time I was quite offended, so maybe it seemed worse than it is.

“When a majority is oppressing a minority, that can also involve human rights, it’s that basic notion of the discrimination against people based solely on what they choose to put in their body, rather than the harm they do to others.” by Ironic_Aliin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual -1 points0 points ago

Changing laws is done only by politicians. It comes up during elections. Nandor left politics partly because of the issue. There's at least one political party devoted to just this issue. Advocating the change of laws is a political issue no matter how you play with semantics.

A political athiest doesn't believe in the current way of governing

Wanting a change of polical system is also a political belief.

Students...will the lack of allowances for PG studies really put you off further study? by mamba_79in newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 0 points1 point ago

You provided an enormous list of cultural history which showed culture was created by people with no formal loans or allowances scheme at all.

The internet was created through public defense money, not education.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

I really like the moderation and if moderators started banning people for opinions /r/atheism would fracture and die in a massive drama storm and this valuable resource would be lost. But I think that's not neccesary, we're all atheists here so all we need to do is use reason and politely remind one another when we're going too far or not being constructive.

The community has improved a lot lately, I'm not sure exactly why because I didn't visit for the longest time, and I think there's a lot more members here today who are interested in constructive discussion than there used to be. Gandhi said "be the change you want to see in the world", and I think that posting about positive approaches to atheism will help a lot.

Thanks /r/atheism for rescuing me. Together we can save more from brainwashing. by fauxmosexualin atheism

[–]fauxmosexual[S] 0 points1 point ago

Oh definitely, there are good memes and ragecomics that come from /r/atheism but a lot of them are in a tone that discourages further discussion and alienates potential converts (de-converts?) to atheism. It's those ones I dislike because they only serve to slow down the advance of reason and atheism.

“When a majority is oppressing a minority, that can also involve human rights, it’s that basic notion of the discrimination against people based solely on what they choose to put in their body, rather than the harm they do to others.” by Ironic_Aliin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 0 points1 point ago

For interesting New Zealand related content. This submission has nothing NZ-specific in it whatsoever. Your views are about the legalisation of cannabis, which is a political issue. I don't believe there is such a thing as a political atheist, only political apathists.

Students...will the lack of allowances for PG studies really put you off further study? by mamba_79in newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 1 point2 points ago

How did they learn how to teach?

School. I daresay their ability would not be impeded even if no philosopher anywhere had ever even considered the nature of beauty.

How did academia happen in the days before public funding? Did the greeks levy a tax so that anyone who wanted to, regardless of their ability, could spend their days pontificating on the nature of truth?

I see the value in cultural studies, I just don't think it requires public funding for thousands of individuals while there are still gaping holes in our knowledge economy that need plugging. Like I say, fans of humanities are welcome to follow their dreams and secure private funding, or even public loans, to indulge their hobbies but the dividends to this obscure notion of human knowledge is limited and history has proved we don't need to give away free public money to achieve those results.

“When a majority is oppressing a minority, that can also involve human rights, it’s that basic notion of the discrimination against people based solely on what they choose to put in their body, rather than the harm they do to others.” by Ironic_Aliin newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual -1 points0 points ago

I think in attempting to argue with me you've just proved me right. Prohibition is bad, I agree along with about 90% of /r/newzealand. You're not only preaching to the choir but attempting to shoehorn your political views in where ever they fit, an many places they don't. That's not why people sub to /r/nz.

That post was on /r/nz - what was the agenda of the poster on that story? did you have a straw man/ad hominem attack about that poster's agenda?

It was about a very important thing that happened in NZ.

Students...will the lack of allowances for PG studies really put you off further study? by mamba_79in newzealand

[–]fauxmosexual 1 point2 points ago

Moral of the story: University is where you go once you've made an adult decision about the course of your life, not an extension of secondary school. You enrolled in the wrong degree, it's not the taxpayer's fault you didn't do your due dilligence.

view more: next