I was falsely accused of rape and didn't go to jail!

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

Are you a feminist?

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

Do women have different DUI settings?

hardwarequestions · 2 months

You are the one without understanding.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

You still don't get the or object part. You say when a man is raped the penetrator is the victim, but that sentence states that an object could stand in the place of his penis. GET IT NOW?

hardwarequestions · 2 months

Also it does not include women raping men with their hand.

True, but I can see where that's open to debate. I would count that as rape, myself.

would you count a man inserting his fingers into a woman's vagina as rape?

hardwarequestions · 2 months

because the sentence includes the "or object" phrase, it indicates the intended reading is that the penetrator is the rapist, not the victim. That and the other problem of the non-standard perp and victim crime definition having both in the one sentence as subjects as necessitated in your reading.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

For your reading to be correct, the perp and victim are both subjects of that sentence, as different parts of it apply to both. That is where the switch is made. But your reading STILL wouldn't be correct because of the "or object" part which indicates how it should be read.

YES HE COULDN'T BE RAPED BY SOME BITCH MASTURBATING HIM. BUT WOMEN CAN BE RAPED BY HAND. The definition favors women.

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

since there are no consequences for false rape accusations i think men could start crying rape after drunk sex if they don't like the woman or want revenge.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

the definition does not include men being raped vaginally by women and does not include women raping men with their hand on his penis. police are also trained on the definition.

avoiceformen · 2 months

he's saying a drunk has responsibility for their actions in the same way as they are when DUI

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

if he had the same intoxication level as a female who was raped, then it would seem impossible to say he was not raped.

butch_is_stupid · 2 months

it doesn't matter if you don't find it compelling. it's a fact. christians don't find evolution compelling.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

but it ruins your bizarre reading of that sentence.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

no it does not simply say that. the sentence includes "or object" which leaves no doubt as to how it is meant to be read. Also it does not include women raping men with their hand. Don't spread misleading bullshit.

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

so a drunk man could not get a woman charged with rape if he went to the police?

butch_is_stupid · 2 months

yes a great crime that created many wars and millions of dead people of all ages and genders and you say, "whatever" to evidence of official lying and misleading propaganda at the very least.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

that is stupid and you should know it. crimes are not defined by switching the victim and perp mid-sentence. the "or object" gives it away. also how can a man be raped by some bitch giving him a handjob? even if your dyslexic reading of it were true, hands can't be penetrated.

and yes, it does specify the "consent of whom" in the last sentence.

butch_is_stupid · 2 months

it's a fact, not a theory.

TracyMorganFreeman · 2 months

engineers want more women to hit on.

keeplogzthrowaway · 2 months

can drunk men not consent, or just women?

butch_is_stupid · 2 months

the current topic is skeptics.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

police do not infer either.

hardwarequestions · 2 months

That does not say shit. According to you objects can now be raped. Are these objects the man legally owns?

hardwarequestions · 2 months

what is between those dots?

butch_is_stupid · 2 months

september 11 terrorist attacks are bullshit. look up the rigged implosion of wtc building 7

brunt2

TROPHY CASE

brunt2

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login