TomSwirly

- friends
53 link karma
18,365 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Four-Year Club

    Verified Email

Hurt Locker director Kathryn Bigelow 'given access to Osama bin Laden intelligence by MrDongin conspiracy

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

One of the few times I yelled at the TV was during the Invasion of Iraq, where the first four tanks to enter Bagdad were named after the four planes that were destroyed in 9/11...

Hurt Locker director Kathryn Bigelow 'given access to Osama bin Laden intelligence by MrDongin conspiracy

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

The truly priceless part is that the Democrats are getting flak for "compromising security" - when of course they're giving the director exactly what information they care to give her.

What do you want to bet that they still won't emit a single photo or video of the whole OBL killing?

You know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist :-D but when you do something major like that and don't provide even one tiny piece of hard evidence, it's hard for a skeptical person not to be suspicious...

The Facebook Fallacy -- "Facebook is not only on course to go bust, but will take the rest of the ad-supported Web with it." It's a marketing business, run by geeks. It's not the next Google, it's the next AOL by phileconomicusin business

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

However, more money has been lost in the auto and airline industry than has been made.

While the airline industry has been dodgy, you're really going to have to come up with some sort of proof that more money has been lost in the auto industry than made.

If you believe the insolvency of GM and Chrysler in 2009 made up for almost a hundred years of profitability before that, well, you need to show us the math - because I think you're just making this up.

The Facebook Fallacy -- "Facebook is not only on course to go bust, but will take the rest of the ad-supported Web with it." It's a marketing business, run by geeks. It's not the next Google, it's the next AOL by phileconomicusin business

[–]TomSwirly 5 points6 points ago

TV ads have a fifty year proven record of success... based on the crap that Facebook tries to sell me, I'm unconvinced. I click on Google ads all the time because I'm searching for things to buy - in years, I've never once clicked on a Facebook ad.

First Skydive without parachute successful! by notcricketin worldnews

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

Dismissive comments?!?! WTF?

I have only the vaguest knowledge of how this is done - enough to know how difficult and dangerous this is. I came here to say that this guy can get a beer from me any time.

I also came here to say that the headline, "Skydiver Becomes First To Land Without Chute", is factually wrong. People have fallen out of planes before without parachutes and lived to tell the tale - source. It's a thousand to one chance, and these few people were the "one".

No, Gary Connery is the first man to deliberately do this and survive. This replaces luck with planning and skill - my hat is off to him!

Would anyone want to discuss the creation of an Indonesian subreddit? by WildYorkiesin languagelearning

[–]TomSwirly 2 points3 points ago

Ide bagus! Saya suka bahasa itu, tapi tidak ada orang2 disini untuk percakapan...

(And your description as to your moderator issues illustrates one of the big issues with Reddit - that moderators have complete power and no one else has any power at all...)

This is how we win. by fuzzoin obama

[–]TomSwirly -3 points-2 points ago

Have you considered that all this "staying on offense", "controlling the message" and "moving to the next punch" are simply propaganda? Perhaps if Mr. Obama had showed the slightest interest in fighting for the working man rather than the rich, he wouldn't have to do this sort of thing?

This is how we win. by fuzzoin obama

[–]TomSwirly -2 points-1 points ago

But... Mr. Obama has been the best friend Wall Street ever had. Look at all the Goldman alums who've been in the Administration. Look at how, early on, he preserved the investment bankers' bonuses in the same week he demanded pension cuts for auto workers before the auto companies got bailouts. Where are the investment bankers getting taken away in handcuffs?

Your average guy in America is NOT getting a fair shot. And Mr. Obama hasn't helped that at all.

This is how we win. by fuzzoin obama

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

Why?! Why should anyone pay these people off?

I don't even buy the "too big to fail" garbage - I think if the value of your company goes below 0, you should just be out of the game, that's what would happen to me or to you! - but if it does get to that point and the government bails them out, why then do the people who ran these companies into the ground get to keep their bonuses (which are fraudulent because the bonuses were in almost all cases greater in total than the companies' actual profits!) and keep their cushy jobs? Why do the stockholders not lose everything - and the government get to own the companies - this is what would happen if their price fell below zero and they got a private bailout?

PythonAnywhere's first press release is more honest than most, if you only read the first letter of each sentence... by gpjtin Python

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

That doesn't make too much sense now, does it?

Sure it does! "SEO" means search engine optimization - many of these people create spam farms and do other spammy things to get higher ranking. FTW means "for the win".

I read this off and immediately laughed, and I think a lot of other people did too.

Nurse refuses student inhaler during asthma attack (teenager's mother finds him locked inside the nurse's office, unconscious on the floor.) by Sugar_Skullin politics

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

"I watched a child die painfully because someone else told me it was OK."

Nurse refuses student inhaler during asthma attack (teenager's mother finds him locked inside the nurse's office, unconscious on the floor.) by Sugar_Skullin politics

[–]TomSwirly 15 points16 points ago

"I was just following orders" didn't work for the Nazis - it shouldn't work for her, either.

She's a trained nurse. If she doesn't understand that someone's life takes priority over rules, then she deserves to not only lose her life, but be charged with reckless endangerment.

Holy cow! The new Google doodle is a playable Moog synth! by talkwin Music

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

Nope, that ain't it. I have the most recent upgrade to Chrome, it doesn't work. Works fine on my Safari...

Holy cow! The new Google doodle is a playable Moog synth! by talkwin Music

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

Nope. I have this issue on Chrome but not Safari, go figure, and I think it's definitely a bug - it works fine on Safari, and nothing I do makes sound on Chrome.

Tennessee Man loses $22,000 to cops. No charges filed, no arrest made. "If somebody told me this happened to them, I absolutely would not believe this could happen in America." That was the reaction of a New Jersey man who found out just how risky it can be to carry cash through Tennessee. by Mind_Virusin politics

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

Of course, there's no advantage to ever consenting to any search and sometimes an advantage not to (be polite!) - but in the US, the motor vehicle exception means cops can basically search any vehicle at whim, so your lack of consent will be in practice irrelevant.

See my comments elsewhere on this page for more details.

Tennessee Man loses $22,000 to cops. No charges filed, no arrest made. "If somebody told me this happened to them, I absolutely would not believe this could happen in America." That was the reaction of a New Jersey man who found out just how risky it can be to carry cash through Tennessee. by Mind_Virusin politics

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

Also, don't ever let a cop search your car....there is no reason to ever let a cop do that willingly.

Unfortunately, in the United States your civil rights are extremely limited when you're in a car because of the motor vehicle exception - they can search your car just for "driving erratically" which really is their word against yours, and there is really nothing you can do about it.

Whenever the police ask if they might search you, you should never consent but never resist a search under any circumstances, they'll do it anyway and probably rough you up, if the search was illegal it won't be admissible in court particularly if you were very clear that you didn't consent.

Say something very polite like "I'm sorry, I'm not consenting to any search you might make" and if they tell you they're going to search anyway, repeat that you don't consent but that you won't resist either.

Note also that you have stronger rights regarding personal searches, so don't consent there either (but also, don't resist, even passively...)

Generally, you aren't even necessarily required to answer questions from the police, though this can be hard to do without pissing them off, and even lying to the police is generally not a crime, though it's a bad idea if you can avoid it, better to omit things or just answer some other question and look dumb.

Acting dumb and honest is always a good idea. The police meet a lot of dumb people, they'll never be surprised if you say something stupid. When I go through customs, I always tell myself, "I am a boring and cheerful person with nothing to hide. Ask me a question and I'll talk your ear off cheerfully," and if I'm flagged for extra screening (it seems to be about one time in ten), after one question, they generally don't even finish searching my bag.

If I'd been him, I'd have kept the money on my person, I'd have said that I had no large sums of money on my person, then if he finally got to a probably inadmissible personal search and found it, I'd claim that whatever sum of money I have there is not large, "When I bought my house, I had to take out twice as much money, and my wife was really nervous, so I told her..." :-D

Note: IANAL, and the laws in the USA vary somewhat from state to state, but this general idea will get you through a lot of trouble - be very polite, very cooperative, very dumb, but do not consent to searches, and do not directly answer any incriminating or even suspicion-inducing questions.

French millionaires on the run by HolteEnderin socialism

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

You're a capitalist. Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is?

I'll make you a public bet if you like - something large enough to hurt - and if I win I'll donate my winnings to some charity relevant to this group. Conditions to be determined, but I think we can come up with a pretty generous definition of "collapse" and a reasonably long length of time, and I'd still bet and even give you odds.

French millionaires on the run by HolteEnderin socialism

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

according to the article it seems like a lot of valuable tax revenue is being lost.

Perhaps you read another article, one with actual facts in it? I read an article with tidbits like:

“Since February, when Hollande announced his wealth tax, there has been a large rise in web searches from French customers,”

"Not only wealthy French, but Greeks, Italians and Spaniards are seeing the UK as a safe haven for their gotten gains. When the expected rush of patriotic French arrive in London, they will not have to look far to be right at home."

...but not one single actual fact whatsoever - he doesn't name a single individual who's moving from France, nor one who's planning to move, nor provide a single statistic showing people are moving or indicating they might, a graph or chart, he doesn't even name an expert or in fact identify anyone at all who's claiming that this is happening or will happen in the future.

Let me repeat - there isn't one identifiable fact in that whole article - in other words, it's not just that the article is not true, but it's not even false either.

French millionaires on the run by HolteEnderin socialism

[–]TomSwirly 1 point2 points ago

And I'm pretty sure most European tax codes are more strict.

!!

You're just making this up. As far as I know, the United States is unique in taxing its citizens when they work abroad.

I'm a triple citizen - Australia, Britain and Canada (long story). I work in the United States, I pay taxes there even though I'm not a US citizen, and I know for a fact I don't owe a penny in tax to any of the countries where I'm actually a citizen.

Exactly what sort of claim would, say, the UK have on my earnings? I left there when I was seven - in 1970!

As far as I know, everywhere else you're taxed where you make the money. The US demands taxes from their citizens who work abroad, but then force those foreign countries to allow those US taxes to be deducted against theirs, meaning that the taxpayer isn't really double-taxed, but that the US collects the lion's share of the tax revenue - even though the American taxpayer is using the government's services in the foreign country.

It's deeply unfair but there's not much can be done about it because the US sets the rules. I never thought about it before, but I'd guess it contributes at least somewhat to resentment of Americans living abroad.

You're deep in the woods and stumble upon a cubic foot of pure gold. How do you get it out? by Harakouin AskReddit

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

First question is - why is it there? Whose is it?

Gold is very soft and very dense.

  1. Bring out a spade, plastic wrap and a hacksaw.
  2. Cut off 40 pounds or so, that's about a million dollars.
  3. Bury it as deeply as you can and hide your traces - somehow.
  4. Now go back home and figure out exactly how to sell a million dollars in gold at any sort of reasonable price without getting the government on your back.
  5. Repeat steps 1-4 about 30 times.

Reddit, as a classical musician, tell me what we could do better. What is it about classical music that keeps you away from our concerts? by a12345678910in AskReddit

[–]TomSwirly 0 points1 point ago

Hello - I'm a musician myself, very familiar with classical music though I stopped playing it after high school.

There are so many problems I don't know where to start. I'll just list them at random.

  • The field of music is far broader than it used to be.
  • And music itself has much more competition for people's entertainment time. When I was young, if you wanted to see a movie, you saw it in the theater, or waited for it to appear on broadcast TV. Video games weren't bigger than Hollywood. There was no reddit, no internet.
  • You often aren't allowed to dance to classical music, and if you are, it's often formal dances like waltzes that people don't know how to do today.
  • You often can't drink alcohol while watching classical music.
  • You nearly always watch classical music sitting down. I sit down all day, when I go out I wanna go and bounce around (and I'm turning 50 this year).
  • Lyrics are less common in classical music, they are frequently not in English, and even then are fairly hard for people to make out.
  • Nor do the lyrics in classical music generally speak to the modern human condition, particularly for people who aren't musicheads. For example, the heavy emphasis on religious themes in classical doesn't bother me at all as a musician because, well, I just love music - but I'm not a plastic artist (i.e. painter, sculptor) and when we toured Italy last year I got really, really sick of seeing Jesus over and over again.
  • A symphony is not a financially efficient way to make music. A four-piece rock band is quite competitive with a symphony orchestra for range and expression - I'd argue that the electric bass, at least, does a better job than a row of cellos - but is an order of magnitude cheaper in cost. And a four-piece rock band is less efficient than a guy rapping over a pre-recorded tape or just a DJ.
  • Because classical music is expensive and requires expensive and specialized concert halls and teachers, it has needed government money to keep it going. This money is going away, and might never be back.
  • For classical music, and other branches of music that are in trouble like jazz, having an educated ear is a distinct advantage - but fewer people, particularly in the US, have that educated ear.
  • Once a piece of classical music starts, you're essentially trapped in your seat - you can't wander around. Many classical pieces are "extremely long" by today's standards - many people have told me about being stuck in a seat with some classical piece that they found uninteresting.
  • A lot of the orchestral music in the last 50 years or so is pretty horrid. Frankly, if I had the choice of saving all of Pierre Boulez or just one Butthole Surfers album after the apocalypse, I'd gladly lose all the Boulez - and I'd throw a lot of others onto the fire too, Elliott Carter being the next alphabetically.
  • A lot of the remainder is pretty hard. I personally love Schönberg but I suspect that perhaps 10% of my friends could sit through Moses und Aron (though everyone I've ever played Pierrot Lunaire for has loved it...)
  • A lot of the people who are left want to be seeing "new music" - what people call "contemporary classical". There has however been a lot of hostility to performing this in orchestras. It's very understandable, because most of the audience for classical music is older and not so receptive to this.
  • There is a huge barrier to entry for new performers in the field. If you wanted to learn, say, the bass and start a rock band, you might be able to do your first gig in a few months if you worked hard. If you were rapping, perhaps less time than that. It would take you a lot longer to get good, yes - but in order to play classical music with others you need literally years of practice to get to the point of "not horrible".

It makes me very sad to say this, but I don't see this ever getting fixed. Some of the problems could be attacked, but for many others it's just not clear what to do, and there are simply too many of them.

“Democrat” Roy Schmidt pulls ultimate dick move, jumps to GOP too late for another Dem to run by HouseSpeakerin politics

[–]TomSwirly -2 points-1 points ago

What, a place for third-rate political hacks to go when no one else will accept them? Gee, I hope not...

view more: next