Maxion

- friends
9,634 link karma
16,823 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

Thought I'd share this useful infographic on colour temperatures by Spacenoodlesin photography

[–]Maxion 2 points3 points ago

I've never come across a scene that I couldn't get the color correct in camera. I doubt you need lens filters for anything.

DPReview's full review of the 5D Mark III by testing78378in photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

We're talking two different things. You're looking at ISO 100 images in daylight. I'm looking at the 2600 k low light shots which are much more relevant to my own shootings.

What is your favorite flash diffuser? by cooler81in photography

[–]Maxion 0 points1 point ago

Most flash diffusers do very little, most gives you less control over the light and of the end result.

Something like the the black foamie thing is one of the best

Portraits at noon by fobdin photography

[–]Maxion 3 points4 points ago

Find some shade; shoot there; profit.

DPReview's full review of the 5D Mark III by testing78378in photography

[–]Maxion 3 points4 points ago

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii/22

This page is particularly interesting. Shows two things.

1) The JPGS with standard settings look absolutely horrible compared to what an optimally processed RAW would look like

2) Actual low light performance between the 5D II, 5D III and D800 is very very close. The d800 has better shadows than either, and the D III slightly better than the 5D II. The differences are too small to be of any importance in any real life situation.

Question about entry level DSLR's by richiecanuckin photography

[–]Maxion 4 points5 points ago

Well, afaik all dslrs offer the controls you need, the lower end of the dslrs all have more P&S like features built in (like different scene modes). They won't really hinder you.

Everest climber: It's like 'a morgue' by bathysphere22in CampingandHiking

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

Yes, it is an achievement to climb it, but it's also fun to go to disneyland.

Canon discontinuing Speedlite 580EX II, EF 24-70 f/2.8L and more! WTF? by WishForACanon5DMark2in photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

I could do 90% of my jobs as a professional photographer with the 600D.

Professional photographers of reddit, what's it like? by realiztikin photography

[–]Maxion 13 points14 points ago

I work as a freelance event photographer. I mainly shoot events for corporate clients but I also do events for regular people as well as the odd portrait job or some other small thing for existing clients.

Days vary wildly, I don't think I've ever had a similar day ever. For some very odd reason work usually comes in bunches, like 4-5 big gigs over the span of 3-4 days and then 1-2 weeks of no gigs.

What's it like to live off of your pictures?

It kind of feels like you're not doing work, like your a bum or someone without a proper job, since most of the time regular people are at work I'm at home surfing reddit, doing paperwork & trying to get more work. Then, sometimes, it's idiotically hectic like this week has been. I've slept around 4-5 hours the last two nights and worked the rest of the time I've been awake. Just came home from the last gig of this "bunch" and I've now got 4 000 images to sort, edit & send off (hopefully by days end).

How do you go about paying for all the equipment?

I started working professionally with the equipment I had when I was still more of an amateur, I haven't bought everything at once but slowly over the past 6+ years. Now that I use my cameras a lot they're more like tools to me than anything else, I now prefer using things I'm used too that the best I can. I also think more economically when buying things. I don't buy new equipment just because I want too, but either because something broke, "I need X to do job Y, X and Z", or some other reason which would result in more money or in me being able to do the current jobs I do.

What did it take to get where you are?

Stupidity in buying my first camera and getting interested in photography, naivity that I could actually make it as one, stubbornness to brush off everyones opinion that I needed to get a real job when I was starting out, and constantly doing the best job you can no matter how small the gig is.

Photography isn't a job where one day you're you and the next day you're a photographer. It's something you slowly become, some photographers decide to make a career out of it, other just prefer it as a hobby.

Do you recommend photography?

If you ask this question, then I won't recommend it. It's something that will come naturally if you want to do it enough, anyone you ask will just tell you that you shouldn't so you shouldn't ask the question if you want a positive answer.

It has it's positive days and it's negative days. You have to be emotionally pretty strong, there are a lot of days when you feel like shit and think you've made the wrong career choice, that you're actually a shit photographer and that you charge too much and you'll be out of work next month and then there'll be other days when you feel like you own the world.

IMO an important trait photographers need to have is that you shouldn't worry too much about the future or about things cocking up so to say. If you constantly worry about things then you're entire life as a photographer will be full of stress. You're always looking at "an empty calendar", always waiting for the next job not knowing when it is or what it'll be. But once you get enough clients that trust you and have hired you for a few gigs you get a good baseline of people who call you a couple times a year for something and then you're pretty set.

"Prerequisite(s)" for a career in wildlife filming/photography? (NatGeo for example) by bets_too_much_hundoin photography

[–]Maxion 3 points4 points ago

IMO as a working pro, college is only worth it for the knowledge you get there, if you go there just to get a piece of paper in the hopes that it will make it easier for you to get work as a photographer then you'll just be wasting your time.

The only thing that's ever been asked of me are my portfolio, and what would it cost, if those two are OK they sometimes ask 'Can you do it?'

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

It may be, depends on where you live. Where I live, home insurance covers cameras, and travel insurance covers them when you're away from home.

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 0 points1 point ago

You'll have to be a bit more specific that that.

Having a lot of detail in a photo just means it's technically good. Read up on any basic photography guide to achieve that.

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 0 points1 point ago

The same way as with a dslr, although you have to keep in mind that the longer film is exposed the less sensitive to light it becomes. How much depends on the type of film used.

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

Honestly, if you're not getting properly paid it's not worth it.

You don't want your name out there, you want the knowledge that you're a good pro photographer out there.

The pro photographer part won't be mentioned if you did a photo for a gift card.

Also, I've never gotten work from having my name next to a photo. I HAVE gotten work from referrals from clients to whom I've taken photos.

If you want to do this shoot, do it because it's fun. And do it totally for free, or demand proper payment.

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

Have you checked if your home insurance will cover your camera? or what a camera insurance would cost?

Weekly question thread: Ask /r/photography anything you want to know about photography or cameras! Don't be shy! Newbies welcome! - May 21st Edition by frosticklein photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

I'd like to echo strobist, some really great stuff there.

Also the book light, science and magic is a good one. Get that book, two stands, two flashes and some umbrellas and start practicing.

You'll soon start to get the hang of things and then move up to some monolights and softobxes and stuff.

Let's try some contemporary art photography for a change. Here's a brief intro to Sohei Nishino by delayclosein photography

[–]Maxion 0 points1 point ago

If you market it correctly, Facebook will buy you for a billion.

Auto focus performance surprised me today. by army_shooterin photography

[–]Maxion 4 points5 points ago

I usually don't. When you use your camera(s) enough you get used to how they work, and when you shoot enough events you get used to the flow and you're able to see what's going to happen by judging small clues in behavior and change of overall feel. Then you're just running on instinct when changing any camera setting, it just feels the same way as when you're driving a car. You're not consciously thinking about how to press the clutch & gas when you change gear, you just do it.

The full-auto focus on DSLRs usually choose the closest subject to focus on, for compositions where that works they should be ok. There just comes times when a) they think something else is closest and b) you don't want the closest subject in focus. It's to make sure your camera doesn't do something else than what you want why people use manual settings.

Do you offer unedited images when requested? by thewillbin photography

[–]Maxion 2 points3 points ago

I never mention how many photos I'll deliver. If the client asks I usually tell them that it totally depends on the programme of the event, the more varied & the more things that go on the more images I deliver. I then continue on and try to dodge the question by asking them if there's something specific that they want photos of, and then they usually tell me if there is and then they're happy.

I think the clients asking for many photos don't really want a million photos but instead want photos of a certain thing which they think you might not get. So by dodging the question of how many exactly you'll deliver and turning it into one of what specifically the client wants seems to work quite well.

This way you can still deliver a small amount of photos and keep the overall quality level high, but keep the client happy & confident knowing that he/she'll get what they want.

How to obtain dark, but vibrant and grainy exposure post-edit? by Estranged_Noodlein photography

[–]Maxion 4 points5 points ago

Mainly its due to the light at the venue, not really any editing tricks.

Then it's exposed so as not to clip the shadows, or underexpose them too much and in lightroom the blacks are lifted a bit.

The grain comes from using a very high ISO.

Those photos aren't really anything special at all, just average / below average event photos. They also look like they're not edited at all, just SOOC.

How to obtain dark, but vibrant and grainy exposure post-edit? by Estranged_Noodlein photography

[–]Maxion 2 points3 points ago

It doesn't bring out the extreme shadows, only the "middle shadows". If you use the blacks slider as well as the fill light slider then you won't get results like this.

If you use LR 4 then you can use the blacks & shadows slider to get results like this. It's sooo much better for editing event shots.

Hey /r/photography, can you help with a hardware (?) problem I've been having with my s95? by shum1nat0rin photography

[–]Maxion 2 points3 points ago

It's a dust particle on the sensor, can't do anything about it since your camera can't be opened up easily.

$10,000 Projectile by The_Fontin photography

[–]Maxion 2 points3 points ago

That lens flying doesn't belong to reuters, they said in the article that they didn't suffer any loss of gear (just goes to show the quality of the people they've got working for them, that they can foresee something like this and take at least some measures to minimize equipment loss).

Poor, poor freelancer :(

Ideas? by Travlarin photography

[–]Maxion 1 point2 points ago

There aren't any unique photos you can take which will give you money, they're all taken already.

People don't buy art because of art's sake, they buy art because of who'se made it. Before you're known you won't sell your landscapes for much.

Any photo that's remotely easy to take and that conveys a concept is already done, check any photo stock website.

People generally pay you to take the photos which aren't unique, and which can't be bought from a stock web site. This is event coverage, news coverage, portraits or product / ad photography.

You could maybe get some events to shoot from regular people, but to get better paying things you'll need to be trusted; and that means having a history.

TL;DR: There's no easy way to make a few bucks and buy a new lens.

Do you offer unedited images when requested? by thewillbin photography

[–]Maxion 10 points11 points ago

No. Not unless the client can specify why they need the unedited file. The only times I've given one is when it's for a cover of some magazine and their editors want to do some extensive editing on it and would prefer the RAW file to an edited JPG.

And 300 delivered images? Holy hell that's a lot. Do you really get 300 unique images out of a wedding? Surely there's got to be several images that are very similar?

I almost never deliver more than 150 images from an event.

view more: next