DrZoidberg_Homeowner

- friends
1,640 link karma
1,846 comment karma
send messageredditor for

Folder Of Trust by gygamanin funny

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

More like Folder Of Guilt

You have got to be kidding me. by TheDudishin gaming

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 1 point2 points ago

They're shutting the servers for an hour for an upgrade, no?

Still... ridiculous.

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

They haven't "gotten rid of" nuclear. Fukushima has driven regulatory review, which is forcing utilities and government to improve lax safety and emergency response capabilities. The plants have gradually been going offline for regularly mandated maintenance checks, but they cannot be switched back online again until (very much needed) safety checks/improvements are completed. This is taking longer than the government hoped as the problems are far bigger than initially anticipated.

Nuclear is being replaced with energy efficiency, natural gas backup, and increases in oil and coal burning (but not as much as was predicted).

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 1 point2 points ago

The govt doesn't legally need the permission of local authorities. It has pledged to listen to them though, and it would be political suicide to switch plants back on without local consent.

It's not a vocal minority in opposition though, in every survey I have read more than 50-60% of people in Fukui, Osaka, Kyoto and other areas around Japan are opposed to plant restarts. You have to remember that given speaking out is frowned upon, protest in Japan is not like anywhere else in the world. If you get 15 on the street with signs, in the same situation elsewhere you would get 1500.

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 1 point2 points ago

Except for the waste problem. Except if something goes wrong. Except if the wrong countries have it. Except for how expensive it is.

Luckily the choice isn't just between nuclear and fossil fuel.

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 3 points4 points ago*

For those calling this short sighted idiocy:

There is significant opposition to the restart of the nuke plants because nothing has been done to improve safety at the plants or emergency procedures (which proved to be woefully inadequate post Fukushima) in the surrounding communities to deal with another nuclear incident - which is likely given there is a 70% chance of another major quake within the next few years.

Ohi, the first plant scheduled to restart, has been found to be sitting on several active faults, and the only thing the government has done to test if it is safe is run computer simulations which even Nuclear Safety Commission chief Madarame said were not sufficient to ensure safety (additionally, disaster simulations done with the government's SPEEDI system are based on ludicrously positive scenarios many times less severe than what happened at Fukushima, when they should be based on bad or worst case scenarios). Again, none of the needed upgrades to equipment, infrastructure or emergency procedures at Ohi have been completed.

The public is rightly wary of the restarts given the utilities have been plagued with scandals for years, and a lot of cost-cutting and otherwise unsafe practices have been exposed in the wake of Fukushima. Sure, most of the country's plants may be fine if there are more quakes, but following the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl it's fair enough that the people in this country do not want to take the risk.

It will be tight this summer, and there could be shortages, but that said a lot of the "blackouts are coming!" cries are from the nuke industry and other vested interests trying to scare the public into compliance. With energy efficiency and intelligent demand management there is more than enough natural gas backup to cover shortfalls and keep the lights on. The government has had a year to plan for this eventuality, any shortages are management failures not supply issues.

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

Energy efficiency, oil and natural gas are the main alternatives to nukes in Japan at the moment. Coal use has grown as well, but it's not the "only viable alternative".

On Saturday, the last of the Japans's 50 usable nuclear reactors will be switched off, completely idling a power source that once supplied a third of the country's electricity. by EliphasLeviin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 4 points5 points ago

It wasn't a freak accident no one expected. It was predicted decades in advance. TEPCO knew its tsunami wall was too low ten years before this happened, it knew it had faulty equipment and insufficient backup power, but did nothing to fix the situation because it was cheaper to not do anything.

Just Jew it. by elvisplayerin funny

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

down down down down to jewtown

Fukushima's coolant pool containing over 1500 fuel rods, new and used, is on the verge of collapse. If just one of those rods is MOX containing 6% plutonium, it has the very real potential to kill 2.89 billion people. by seriousmandain environment

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 2 points3 points ago

Ok, I've been in Japan working on the nuclear issue since the meltdowns, and while i'm normally all for spreading the news about the many massive problems here this article is way too THE SKY IS FALLING!! over the top. The spent fuel ponds at Fukushima Daiichi are a very concerning issue, as is the radiation spread from the plant in the year since the meltdowns, however, 2.89 billion people? Really? And that's not going to be put in any sort of context other than the doom-speak of the whole piece? Right. Radioactive pollen in the US? Contaminated soil? How radioactive? how contaminated? Not giving any indication of these numbers is baseless fear-mongering of the worst kind.

80% in Japan 'support nuclear phase-out' by johnmuddin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

Keeping current nuclear plants working is economic because the infrastructure and investment is already in place. New builds are uneconomic and risky, which is largely why there are so few in development globally. Solar and wind are already competitive with nuclear and coal, and on par/rapidly becoming cheaper when you take subsidies out of the equation.

Japan isn't switching nuclear for coal, nor is it even discussing doing this. A small amount of extra coal is being burnt now 52 of 54 reactors are offline, but as mentioned most of the lost nuclear capacity is being made up for with gas. Renewables can be deployed and scaled faster and more economically than nuclear, and they don't have the environmental, economic or social risks that come with nuclear.

80% in Japan 'support nuclear phase-out' by johnmuddin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

It's falling back on gas backup mostly, not on coal. Which is fine as a bridging technology if it makes a strong push to replace its nuclear capacity with renewables and energy efficiency.

Nuclear cannot solve the climate problem in the short term, nor the long term. The plants needed to "solve" the issue and replace dirty forms of generation cannot be built in time to make an impact, and so many need to be built in the longer term that it is not only a pipe dream, but uneconomic and yet another form of tethering to a non-renwable resource that would be exhausted rapidly with the number of plants needed to make a difference.

80% in Japan 'support nuclear phase-out' by johnmuddin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

Japan has huge capacity for renewables, which currently only account for 1% of its energy mix. Wind and solar can be deployed rapidly to compliment existing gas backup as nuclear goes offline, and large increases in geothermal (which Japan has huge potential for) in the longer term. This combined with aggressive energy efficiency (which Japan has been terrible at. It has always had an abundance of power so it hasn't bothered controlling use) means that the risks that come with nuclear in such a seismically active country do not need to be taken.

Australia Passes Controversial Mining Tax Into Law - The Australian Senate has pushed through into law a 30% tax on iron ore and coal mining companies by anutensilin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 9 points10 points ago

Apple isn't taking America's non-renewable natural resources and turning it into profit for its shareholders.

We broke Baldursgate.com by darthbonein baldursgate

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

There's a timer counting down on it now... 16h 20m left

Anger over plans to restart Japan's nuclear plants by DrZoidberg_Homeownerin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner[S] -1 points0 points ago

No deaths - yet. Definitely a jump in radiation related fatal cancers, birth defects, and other serious health issues in the next few decades.

20 protesters inside the government building/meeting room, many more outside on the street.

There are protests because the government is rushing restarts of reactors without taking time to properly assess safety and update emergency procedures, and is doing so behind closed doors allowing the nuclear industry, but not the public, input into what represents a serious risk to all Japanese people.

If the Japanese government was conducting this transparently, and in a way that prioritised safety rather than industry interests then there wouldn't be much public outcry.

epic night sky by gonariain pics

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

Epic and jarring use of clone tool on the right hand side.

Whaling may be sunk by commercial reality by DrZoidberg_Homeownerin environment

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner[S] 0 points1 point ago

I don't think anyone is ignoring it... the article covers this point.

Propaganda is mostly from the pro-whaling side i'm afraid. Environmental groups - while sometimes over emphatic and other times not entirely truthful - are more trustworthy than the vested interests arguing for commercial whaling.

Fukushima nuclear plant worker in coma after collapsing at site by SolInvictusin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 4 points5 points ago

Article says he was exposed to 52 microSieverts (μSv) not milliSieverts (mSv) - but yes, that level won't make anyone sick or cause death. More likely heavy strain of working knocking an older guy around.

Australia Tells Japan Whalers to Stay Out of it Waters - Again by anutensilin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

How was I wrong? The ship DID come into the 12 mile zone around macquarie island.

Australia Tells Japan Whalers to Stay Out of it Waters - Again by anutensilin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 0 points1 point ago

I didn't say Paul wasn't a liar, but it would be nice if people read things before commenting.

Australia Tells Japan Whalers to Stay Out of it Waters - Again by anutensilin worldnews

[–]DrZoidberg_Homeowner 9 points10 points ago

Why do people comment without bothering to read the article?

The SM2 followed SSCS into Australia's territorial waters.

view more: next