CheapBeer

- friends
289 link karma
2,796 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Verified Email

Project Beach Towel by TheGhostOfNoLibsin EnoughPaulSpam

[–]CheapBeer 12 points13 points ago

What the hell did I just read?

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -6 points-5 points ago

And the mindless down-voting that libretarians and conservatives hate are jut as guilty of doing it.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -5 points-4 points ago

And I apologized for it. Yet you see me get downvoted for even some truths.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -14 points-13 points ago

Yes, I make mistakes. I guess I am not some literary genius like half of reddit makes themselves out to be.

How bots silence Ron Paul critics and threaten the democracy of Reddit. by robotevilin politics

[–]CheapBeer 2 points3 points ago

Apparently I disturbed the hornet's nest about my small critisicism of RP.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -8 points-7 points ago

You're citing partisan and biased internet news as your source. It's not credible.

I see the dailypaul and infowars being quoted as scripture on The RP subforum.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -14 points-13 points ago

I agree, it could have been more short and concise. I occasionally forget to read out my posts after I type them.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -16 points-15 points ago

Well,

He states that there isn't sufficient evidence to support the impeachment of George W. Bush

Then if that's what he said, that makes my headline correct.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -9 points-8 points ago

As I said before, I do not hate RP no matter how much you seem to think otherwise. I subscribe to EPS because I get tired of the constant stream of RP articles that add no substance like many Obama and Romney articles.

What are your feelings towards him as a Congressman, Presidential nominee, as a person

As a Congressman, I think for the few times he has been right on say censorship, the drug war, and some parts of our foreign policy. It does not make him right the issues of civil rights, rosa parks medal, the fed, and inflation. As a person, I do not know what to make him. For all his efforts he seems like a genuine guy at a heart but he is just much a politician and I am still confused on the newsletters and if he did them or not.

Your right, I am not an armchair expert on impeachment and won't pretend to be. But if RP is claiming that

Citing a demand Wednesday that regain respect for the War Powers Act

We know that is a completely bunk charge as he acted within the time limit.

Was the architect of the legislation, 9-term North Carolins Congressman, Walter Jones.

That just reeks of partisan bullshit and no politician is above that right now, not even Ron Paul.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -12 points-11 points ago

How does posting to EnoughPaulSpam make me any less legitimate? I never said I hated arP either so throw your wild accusations elsewhere.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -11 points-10 points ago

I think it's important to point out RP's inconsistencies as much as they point out Obama's or Romney's.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -6 points-5 points ago

I find it hard to believe there is no real evidence against Bush/Cheney but somehow there was plenty against Clinton.

He states that there isn't sufficient evidence to support the impeachment of George W. Bush

Then if that's what he said, that makes my headline correct.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -13 points-12 points ago

I have no idea. Yet It doesn't excuse what Ron Paul said and then did.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] 7 points8 points ago

I thought breaking the law mattered? He certainly felt strong enough about it when it came to Obama and Clinton.

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -5 points-4 points ago

YesI did. And like I said, Kucinich brought about articles of impeachment against Bush. If RP felt so strongly about, why did he not pursue it but pursued it when Clinton was in office and now with Obama?

So why is Ron Paul co-sponsoring a bill for the impeachment of Obama and voted for impeachment for Clinton but felt that there were no grounds for Bush to be impeached? by CheapBeerin politics

[–]CheapBeer[S] -9 points-8 points ago

No, i'm asking if Ron Paul Wants Obama impeached for his war crimes and voted to impeach Clinton because of his war crimes. Why did he not want Bush impeached after making the statements that he did in that infowars article?

The 'Julia' Backlash: Because Americans Like to Pretend They Don't Need Government by davidreiss666in politics

[–]CheapBeer 7 points8 points ago

When a good chunk of America doesn't realize they're on one or more forms of Government assistance and still says the Government needs to be minimalized, it's a great laugh.

view more: next