this post was submitted on
330 points (70% like it)
574 up votes 244 down votes
top 200 commentsshow all 302

[–]thiefofjoy 127 points128 points ago

Although I can't speak directly to what causes suicidal thoughts in humans as this takes a great deal of psychological and medical perspective that I lack, I can speak to the presence of suicidal behavior in animals on a very basic level.

The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), when parasitized by Braconid wasps, (Aphidius ervi) exhibit a cost sensitive suicidal behavior depending on both their reproductive contribution to their population and the probability of their spreading the disease to kin. Essentially what this means is that parasitized adults will become "suicidal" the cost of their life is exceeded by the risk to their immediate gene pool.

It is noteworthy, however, that the "suicidal behavior" is not the same as it would be for humans who are intent on killing themselves or larger animals that exhibit suicidal-like characteristics (there are numerous anecdotal accounts of Philippine Tarsiers committing suicide by bashing their heads against hard surfaces when in captivity or exposed to extreme stress). For the pea aphids, this suicidal behavior amounts to choosing more dangerous routes when escaping from their predators.

It becomes immediately apparent when reading more about accounts (confirmed and unconfirmed) of suicide in the wild that there is a large gradient with no clear division between what does and what does not constitute "suicide". I would expect that in each species, the reasons behind suicidal behavior are unique products of the evolution of their life history.

Two abstracts on the pea aphid and its parasite:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347205806761

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v328/n6133/abs/328797b0.html

[–]obsa 83 points84 points ago*

I thought I read an article about a captive panda killing her cubs and then herself. Can anyone substantiate what I'm failing to remember?

Ahh, here we go: Mother bear kills cub and then itself. It's that story that cropped up several months ago about the bear bile farms in China. That's a messed up situation.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]exitthewarrior 7 points8 points ago

Not really related- but has anyone ever been to a Japanese zoo? I have when I was little, and it was just so sad. They are really depressing, and I'm surprised more animals don't exhibit "suicidal behavior" in those settings as well (which are often similar to those on that bear bile farm in China).

[–]1nfid3l 13 points14 points ago

The Japanese correctional system is apparently pretty horrid as well

[–]robertgentel 1 point2 points ago

Definitely a messed up situation but I remember when reading the story that it might have been largely anthropomorphized and suicide might not have been the bear's intention at all, just a sad consequence of her distress.

[–]obsa 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, certainly the emotion of the circumstances incline us to believe the suicide story, but it could have just been an act of total confusion.

[–]onryo -2 points-1 points ago

That article makes me want to hurt someone. Forget tradition, where your moral compass?

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]BernardLaverneHoagie 37 points38 points ago

It is noteworthy, however, that the "suicidal behavior" is not the same as it would be for humans who are intent on killing themselves or larger animals that exhibit suicidal-like characteristics...

This is a great point. Simply because the behavior resembles what we consider "suicide", does not mean it shares the same etiology. There is a good amount of anecdotal evidince that points to animal "suicide", but we must be cautious when attributing that title to the acts described. Just because a monkey jumps off a cliff and kills itself and it resembles a man jumping off a cliff to kill himself, does not mean both are the same act. We should be careful not to reify things that may not exist.

Rather, we can try to better understand human suicide and hopefully come up with some better explainations why such a behavior would exist. A theroy that I have read in a number of books suggests that suicide is an evolutionary adaptive mechanism in that it alerts others in a "pack" that the environment is not "fit" for optimal survival. Think canary in a coal mine.

Check out this article from the LA Times: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/feb/12/health/he-evpsych12

I don't want to make the claim that animal sucide does not exist, rather that we simply don't know one way or the other. We have seen animals "kill themselves" on a few different occasions, but it's difficult to really say with certainty if that is "suicide". In my opinion, the notion that suicide is evolutionary adaptive might suggest it's not unique to humans. Though further elaboration on this point is necessary before we can make any solid claims.

[–]rmxz 8 points9 points ago

Now you're suggesting that a lot of human suicide shares attributes with a lot of other human suicide.

I imagine there can be many different reasons for people killing itself; as well as many different reasons for animals killing themselves.

Some of which may be shared between humans and animals (defense of their family against unwinnable odds, unbearable pain) and some of which surely are not shared (insults on facebook).

[–]RaginReaganomics 11 points12 points ago

i.e. Samurais vs. depressed teenagers

[–]HarshColdReality 2 points3 points ago

In the time of Samurais, suicide was considered an acceptable thing for as little as missing an archery target or being late for a meeting. Samurais committed suicide if another person of equal or higher rank thought the samurai insulted them. I'm not sure the comparison is that different when you look at it objectively.

[–]StErLiNgR 0 points1 point ago

It was a requirement and part of their Bushido, jus saying

[–]ChaosLFG 1 point2 points ago

So it was based on arbitrary beliefs about self-worth in comparison to others? Sounds about the same.

[–]StErLiNgR 4 points5 points ago

It was more about pride and cultural norms, whereas in modern culture suicide is frowned upon.

[–]Ambiwlans 1 point2 points ago

Suicide was more common but you are over dramatizing.

[–]ronin1066 6 points7 points ago

There was the case of the chimp in the group that Jane Goodall worked with. Its mother died and the adolescent chimp stopped eating and after about two weeks was dead. It's hard to call it suicide but surely it got hungry at some point yet didn't eat. Perhaps depression is more apropos. But it seems close to me.

Sapolsky has done extensive research in depression in primates and humans, u might read up on that. Again, not exactly suicide, but similar.

[–]sh545 8 points9 points ago

The definition of suicide is obviously quite important in this question. However there are examples, of human suicide which is similar to the pea aphid. Think of people jumping on top of grenades, or of Lawrence Oates ("I'm just going outside, I may be some time"). I would think people consider Oates to be a kind of suicide, but someone jumping on a grenade as not suicide but an act of heroism.

[–]Czeching_you_out 3 points4 points ago*

The basic translation of the word "suicide" is just "self murder", so both the cases you mention would in the very basic sense be suicides. However, nowadays we often attribute the word to the act of killing oneself after first experiencing suicidal thoughts and ideations (so that there is some kind of planning involved). I believe this "extended" definition is the one the original poster uses.

[–]bedlamos[S] 2 points3 points ago

That is the exact definition I meant to use, sorry to not clarify this when asking the question.

[–]guninmouth 4 points5 points ago

Serious question. Is this perhaps why people overly abuse their bodies with liquor, drugs, and cigarettes? I am not depressed, but I know I will be one day when I end up in diapers in a nursing home, so I continue to smoke and drink while I can enjoy it, and if I pay for it later in life (hopefully in my 80's or so), then it won't come as much of a surprise or be a major loss. Basically, I want to be happy now, and enjoy my youth while it lasts. So it isn't exclusively suicidal behavior, but it might be a more dangerous path for me in my later years, but I am willing to risk those for a more enjoyable life.

[–]stephj 4 points5 points ago

I think not everyone describes that sort of bodily abuse as enjoyment. I'd rather be able to go out and go running or skate or do other physical activity before my joints give out. Plus, all that exercising sets up the body for better self-preservation later down the line so I will be able to walk when I become old and rickety. Excessive smoking and drinking would prevent me from doing that. Some people can handle it and stay physically active; I don't think I could.

[–]stasibornagain 4 points5 points ago

You are saying that liquor, drugs, and cigarettes allow you to more enjoy life. I'll go out on a limb and bet that you are so young that they are still a novelty.

I've met adults who spent a lot of time imbibing in liquor, drugs, and cigarettes. They were not enjoying life. Bad health habits catch up pretty quickly. Drugs can kill at any time. Liquor can kill by the 40's. Cigarettes by the 50's.

[–]bedlamos[S] 2 points3 points ago

My biological father is a meth addict, alcohol abuser, and chronic smoker and I can tell you that at this point in his life the novelty has warn off. The addiction becomes something to depend on because it's the only thing he feels anymore. I feel like you should experiment with certain things in your youth, but don't let it pull you in because it can ruin your life. He has tried to commit suicide countless times.

[–]GringoDeMaio 6 points7 points ago

Opiate addict here. The novelty has most assuredly worn off, but facing all the parts of your life in need of repair can make sobriety terrifying.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]jargonbars 0 points1 point ago

This doesn't reach a conclusion, but it's an interesting article.

Also, some male spiders swing their bodies into the female's fangs during mating. Third Paragraph

[–]2legittoquit 0 points1 point ago

First of all, thats really cool. And that forces the question, was the OP talking about any type of suicidal behavior or suicide from depression? Because there are alot of examples of suicidal behaviors in extremely social animals (particularly insects) where group fitness is more important that individual fitness. (like bees)

[–]mindwhirl 51 points52 points ago

I recently watched this TED talk which touches on a subject I believe to be relevant: http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html

In it Dan Gilbert talks about the human ability to simulate an experience in our mind to "predict" how we will feel about doing something. He talks about the human frontal lobe and in particular the prefrontal cortex being one of the most developed part of the brain since pre-homo sapiens.

His talk focuses on the use of this "experience simulator" primarily for things that make us happy, however I believe it is equally relevant to things which make us sad or afraid. He suggests we can learn to be happy purely by shaping our own artificial experiences. (Something some religions such as Buddhism have proclaimed to do for centuries)

My thoughts here are animals have a similar ability, albeit not as complex. A human can imagine what they might do on next weeks holiday resulting in feeling excited and happy about it. Animals are assumed significantly limited in how far ahead and to what degree they can "simulate" these activities in their mind. I think learned behaviour such as a dog doing a trick for a treat is essentially a simple version of this. Hence I believe animals have this capability at least to some extent.

When problem solving we use this simulation ability to a high degree. Someone suffering from depression or even just assessing options for a difficult problem may "simulate" suicide. With the simulation comes the artificial feelings attached to it such as sadness, helplessness, despair, shame, etc.. As a potential solution it can become more appealing as the mind grows more pessimistic and / or depressed.

To someone suffering from depression they face a seemingly apparent uphill battle for what seems like the rest of their life (the more depressed someone is, the harder it can be to picture being well again) or a brief amount of pain followed by eternal relief.

As someone who has suffered from long term depression this explanation / hypothesis has helped me make sense of my own depression and understand in some form of what is going on inside my head.

I have a growing belief this hypothesis is true in at least some extent in animals (particularly mammals). Think of the fox or wolf which would chew it's own foot off when caught in a bear trap for an extended period of time; The recent example of mice releasing their fellow captives before feeding, actions we perceive as empathy; Whales beaching themselves for seemingly no reason (perhaps they know or sense something we don't).

I think I may have rambled a little bit there but I hope I got across accurately enough what I intended.

[–]Pit_of_Death 9 points10 points ago

This is amazingly astute way of framing the issue. To me, the human capacity for rationalization is the heart of it all, and when someone is depressed and suicidal, that capacity is altered or damaged somehow, even down to a chemical level. I'm only just beginning to understand the science behind depression, and I'm far from an expert in behavioral psychology, but your comment definitely speaks to me.

[–]Mystery_Hours 2 points3 points ago

I think this is the best answer we have. The same mechanisms that make us such effective thinkers can 'turn against us' given the right conditions.

[–]bedlamos[S] 2 points3 points ago

Very insightful, great use of your pre-frontal cortex and frontal lobe! In all seriousness this was a great post and I really appreciate the time you put in to it to help with understanding this phenomenon. Thanks!

[–]Czeching_you_out 5 points6 points ago*

The parent comment should be at the top, or at least way further up. The keyword here is frontal lobe. The size and complexity of the human frontal lobe absolutely trumps those of all other animals (our closest "relative" - the bonobo - included), and it is key for the complex motivation and planning that in many ways define human behavior and that set us apart from other animals.

Fun side note: The reason why the human jaw and oral cavity are relatively small (and why wisdom teeth are a nuisance) is in part due to our massive frontal lobes. If you look at this picture, you will see that the chimpanzee brain leaves more room for the mouth, and that the human brain sort of "dives" downwards.

edit: Downvotes, eh? This might fall on deaf ears, then, but I'll attempt to strengthen my point: Prefrontal lobotomy was shown to decrease the incidence of suicide in psychiatric patients who were admitted due to suicidal ideations. In such a lobotomy one attempted to separate the prefrontal cortex from the rest of the brain.

[–]JimmyCrackCrack 1 point2 points ago

You know I wondered something about this recently in regards to suicide. I wonder if part of how we're able to engage in such maladaptive behaviour is because we're able to simulate an end to pain and suffering but not death.

Although in suicide we do make the decision to die, I think it's a case of not really knowing what dying is or what it really means that allows us to actually do it. We know the meaning of death in an abstract sense, we can describe it using language and can envision dead things exhibiting death-like behaviour (not moving being probably the most obvious) but we cannot possibly simulate what it's like to be dead because it is unlike anything we've ever experienced in life.

I think it's because of this ignorance that as an organism we're able to make a decision that we 'know' will lead to our death; basically, we don't know. When someone makes that decision I think it's more that they're deciding not to suffer anymore, rather than deciding to die. When we think about what will happen after the act, we think about maybe funerals, or maybe sad loved ones, or maybe even our dead body but all of those things are something only a living person can observe, we can't actually imagine death and in a narrow sense, I think people who commit suicide almost think they won't die; they'll just stop suffering.

[–]mindwhirl 0 points1 point ago

Yes. I think that may be quite the case for a lot of people.

You also have some people with the delusion they will be in a form of after life with loved ones. Or some who believe in reincarnation or other variations.

A lot of which stems from the unknown and impossible to know. The arrogance of humans is quite astounding in this regard. We fill the blanks wherever possible with our imaginations or "simulation" engine. Whether it be an afterlife, a monster in the dark, or a malicious motive by another person.

[–]ddunnpsydClinical Psychology|Psychodynamic Theory 13 points14 points ago

Suicidal behavior can have multiple purposes. In its most original state, it is a coping mechanism to end both psychic and physical pain. People with Major Depression or other similar illnesses will feel as if they have lost control of their own body. It becomes extremely difficult for the person to go about a normal routine. Physical pain becomes present in severe cases of depression and presents as muscle fatigue. Suicide is an attempt to end pain in the individual.

The other end of suicidal behavior is that of secondary gains. The person acts out "as-if" they are going to commit suicide in order to be directly intervened on by others. The desire for intervention and attention varies greatly, but is always distressful for those involved. People who feign or act-out in suicidal ways often will not commit suicide when there is no secondary gain to be achieved. Unfortunately it isn't difficult for a person to go from feigning suicide to actually being in the first kind of suicide I described earlier. The other part of feigning is that a person often will actually carry out a long process intended to kill oneself and hoping to be rescued before time ends.

[–]jgdx 23 points24 points ago

In Encounters at the End of the World by Werner Herzog anecdotal evidence suggest that individual penguins in the Antarctic sometimes head for the hills for no reason. A move that is certain death for any living organism.

They even taped one "suicide".

Certainly not scientific, but at least it's anecdotal evidence made by a scientist.

[–]flaviamalinverno 17 points18 points ago

That is sad and fascinating. (Here's the same clip in better quality http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeSH80zfb5k&feature=related)

[–]flabbigans 1 point2 points ago

I wouldn't really call that suicide, I doubt the penguins intend to end their lives.

[–]dfinch 1 point2 points ago

They're completely ignoring their natural instinct to seek food and the safety of the colony. If that's not suicidal, I don't know what is.

[–]flabbigans 0 points1 point ago

It's maybe just some form of psychosis.

[–]j0e 1 point2 points ago

A scene that has stuck with me, one of my earliest memories from childhood, my mother took me to see a nature documentary. This would be in the mid-70's.

I don't remember the rest of the movie but at one point it followed a family of foxes, and one fox wasn't eating as much and was smaller. Then one day it just walked a few miles to the ocean and drowned itself.

[–]Ohang 73 points74 points ago

Animals absolutely commit suicide.

Take, for example, the bears that are harvested for their gall bladder bile.

[–]CogniZENdissonance 11 points12 points ago

The bear strangled its offspring when it lost hope of freeing it. This suggests the bear was aware enough of the prospect for endless suffering her cub faced, and wanted to it free. That's self-awareness in my book, even if not on a human level. And it might explain were human self-awareness comes from. I've always suspected it was merely a complex problem solving function of higher mammals.

[–]JimmyCrackCrack 5 points6 points ago

I think the interpretation of events in the article which matches your criteria for self-awareness is more down to journalistic flourish. If the article were a boring dispassionate description of events it would frame it in a different light, you might interpret it as murder-suicide like the journalist did but you also may not. It's anthropomorphising

[–]CogniZENdissonance 0 points1 point ago*

That's not anthropomorphizing animals. First you have to define self-awareness and suicide as human only activities... we haven't done that yet. Humans are animals. It is not, I hope, unscientific to suggest that human behavior has its origin in animal behavior. While culturally understandable in a world that still largely insists on a strict dichotomy between animal and human, I think it's entirely unjustified. To proceed as if every instance of seeming primitive self-awareness seen in animals is dismissed, because the only animals known to be self-aware are humans, doesn't make sense evolutionarily. A primitive form of self-awareness MUST necessarily exist in other animal minds, if not now that in the past. Or do you suggest its irreducibly complex? Thanks to Darwin, the idea that animals can be like humans shouldn't be so shocking a thought.

[–]JimmyCrackCrack 1 point2 points ago

I think we're at cross purposes on this a bit. My point was that the assumptions made by the journalist about the behaviour of the bear is unverifiable. I don't mean to dismiss the idea that motives projected on to the bear in the article could be why the bear behaved that way; merely that it's a perilous path to assume that's what happened.

That the bear considered the situation and evaluated whether or not a life in a bile farm was worth living, then escaped so it could save it's child from experiencing such a life (by killing it) before taking the decision to end it's own life makes a dangerous number of assumptions about something which we could only know if we somehow knew what the animal was thinking, or could communicate with it and ask.

It's not that animals can't be conscious, it would be a mistake to say that given our common lineage with the rest of the animal kingdom and given we lack a coherent definition of consciousness in the first place. The sequence of events as described in the article are framed as an unmistakably human drama which is no coincidence because as a piece of journalism, it is a more effective and more likely to create the desired flare and inflame righteous outrage at the maltreatment of an animal.

Self aware or otherwise, the actions the animal took apparently resemble some known to be exhibited by some humans in some circumstances. This makes it interesting for what it potentially says about self-awareness and similarity in sets of behaviours in animals besides human beings. If I see a group of animals apparently communicating (which some do) with one another and then see those same animals hunt together later it's possible they were discussing, planning and coordinating the hunt but it'd be an unjustified extrapolation to claim that were definitely the case and I wouldn't be justified in going on to say that those same animals are self-aware on the basis that they plan, coordinate and execute hunts together because that's only speculation based on insufficient data.

[–][deleted] ago*

[deleted]

[–]SuffragetteCinci 72 points73 points ago

Isn't that all suicide is, really? It seems that people with suicidal major depression could be considered "distressed," and we as society typically forgive their behavior because we understand it to have been committed in a state of mind impermeable to normal logic.

"The so-called ‘psychotically depressed’ person who tries to kill herself doesn't do so out of quote ‘hopelessness’ or any abstract conviction that life's assets and debits do not square. And surely not because death seems suddenly appealing. The person in whom Its invisible agony reaches a certain unendurable level will kill herself the same way a trapped person will eventually jump from the window of a burning high-rise. Make no mistake about people who leap from burning windows. Their terror of falling from a great height is still just as great as it would be for you or me standing speculatively at the same window just checking out the view; i.e. the fear of falling remains a constant. The variable here is the other terror, the fire's flames: when the flames get close enough, falling to death becomes the slightly less terrible of two terrors. It's not desiring the fall; it's terror of the flame yet nobody down on the sidewalk, looking up and yelling ‘Don‘t!’ and ‘Hang on!’, can understand the jump. Not really. You'd have to have personally been trapped and felt flames to really understand a terror way beyond falling." - David Foster Wallace

[–]iamrory 4 points5 points ago

I certainly agree with that perspective in some cases of suicide, but it still remains that a lot of human suicide occurs without any psychosis or environmental factors at all. Plenty of people with chronic illnesses or constant depression that never hits psychotically depressed eventually form a rational plan for ending their lives and carry it out like one would any other goal.

In these cases the person is still distressed and can still be considered to be acting under the influence of that stress, but there are plenty of suicides whose level of organization and rationale suggests that they are not merely 'acting out.'

Unfortunately, it's difficult to figure this stuff out with animals. If it was a human caged for bile, we would probably be more likely to think that he finally decided to kill himself rather than one day just freaked out and wound up dying. But when you put the bear back into the situation, I don't really know enough about animal psychology to say.

[–]Quarkster 0 points1 point ago

occurs without any ... environmental factors at all

No such thing. The absence of any given environmental factor is itself an environmental factor.

Humans don't live the way we used to. Many people don't get much exercise and spend a lot of time indoors. Both of these have been linked to depression. Many animals are difficult to keep alive in captivity, more extreme cases of the same general idea.

[–]dev_random 2 points3 points ago

The irony, of course, is that David Foster Wallace comitted suicide himiself after a long battle with depression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Foster_Wallace#Death

Edit: perhaps irony is the wrong word. It seems to me that the fact only lends additional credence to his argument, as someone who would have fully understood the depressed/suicidal mind.

[–]Wish_I_had_a_KLZE 1 point2 points ago*

I really liked your post! Thanks for the insight :)

As a little side note...

...i.e. the fear of falling remains a constant.

This just sparked reminiscent feelings of the fear I've felt whilst falling great distances in dreams, or big falls I've had in real life. The fear for me, gets more intense (almost exponential) the further I fall.

edit: Yep, I get anecdotal way too easy and forget the rules. Will lurk more, post less, unless it's my area. ALTHOUGH - The thankful comment was going to be there anyway, what harm is a little side note? Oh look, this edit isn't science either oh no!

[–]JimmyCrackCrack 0 points1 point ago

While the rest of your post is interesting, I think malzecolon's issue with calling the bear's desperate act which resulted in death the same thing as a decision to die. The mechanisms of desperation might be similar but the intent isn't necessarily the same. There is no evidence in the story of the bear that the animal knew what the result of running in to the wall would be, or even necessarily that hugging the cub in that way would lead to its death either. It might be, but it isn't known.

[–]SuffragetteCinci 0 points1 point ago

You're totally right. The other big question that occurs to me, even if we suppose that the bear is intelligent enough to have made the decision to kill himself rather than endure further agony - what the hell is causing the human brain to bring these depths of pain and fear upon itself absent of any obvious stimuli?

Did hunter-gatherers experience these phenomena? I understand that scientists have demonstrated a lot of psychiatric disorders have genetic and physiological origins. But what about the ordinary people (especially intelligent people) who somehow descent into the depths of sadness over issues too intangible to quantify? Why are people of the supposedly "advanced" 21st century unable to escape these demons? Is it indigenous in us? Have we perverted something deep and essential that we've somehow forgotten was even there?

[–]Mellowed 0 points1 point ago

Sounds like humans are afraid of losing control, then. Jumping is an active decision. Death is inevitable, suicide is a verb.

[–]nospacesallowed 11 points12 points ago

Mentally distressed, acting out against oneself, resulting in death. Hmmm...sounds like our description of suicide to me!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]nospacesallowed 8 points9 points ago

Good point...

[–]Jimmy_Jolene 7 points8 points ago

The bear broke out of her cage, ran to her screaming cub, couldn't free it so she strangled her cub to death and then ran head first into a wall, killing herself. I wouldn't consider dying from infection suicide, but if a person died from the actual act of self-mutilation (like the bear) It would LOOK like a suicide.

You raise a very valid point though. Is a bear capable of making that decision? I don't really know, but I do know if someone was self-mutilating and went over the edge and killed themselves in the process, even if they did not mean to, I think most would consider that a suicide.

[–]kellyrosetta 2 points3 points ago

Self aware, Chimps are self aware, gorillas have culture, that they pass down from parent to kin in the form of Learned actions, eating styles, minor tool stiles that vary from group to group. Bears are one of the more interesting creatures, i wont say they are on the same intelligence level as chimps, or great apes, but it is clear from examples that humans have Greatly underestimated the intelligence level of creatures and even other Human groups before, Bears (reads a bit of information) and i stand corrected,

"Considered by many wildlife biologists to be one of the most intelligent land animals of North America, bears possess the largest and most convoluted brains relative to their size of any land mammal. In the animal kingdom, their intelligence compares with that of higher primates. As highly evolved social animals, bears form hierarchies and have structured relationships with each other, sometimes even sharing resources. In fact, the polar bear, typically thought of as solitary, actually lives within a community of other polar bears and never loses track of other members." source

So again, in all considerations, a Gorilla, can feel depression, be self aware, and even developed individual cultures that change from location to location and are carried on and further developed by progeny, i would not find it unlikely that bear's can and Do feel depression particularly in Overwhelming and obviously cruel and hopeless situations and at the expense of a cub. I understand this is a hypothesis only but still.

[–]Dereliction 2 points3 points ago

Is it really that difficult? Do we really have to have some sort of keen insight into the psychology involved? I mean, isn't suicide simply described by the act of killing oneself on purpose, no matter the psychology behind it?

[–]iamrory 6 points7 points ago

There has to be intention behind the act. A person who accidentally shoots themselves is usually said to have been in a dumb accident, not suicidal.

In this case, there is a still disconnect between the behavior and the result of death. To call it a suicide, you would need to be able to successfully argue that the bear ran into the wall with the intention of ending its life. Even if the bear's intention was merely to reduce or distract from the pain, or just running amok, you can't really call it suicide in the same way a human commits suicide.

A similarly grey area is if someone OD'd. Or cut themselves as a cry for help and died. In both of these cases, I would think that classifying the deaths as accidental would be much more accurate than calling them suicides.

[–]Dereliction 1 point2 points ago

I think we just need to observe the intent to do the act of suicide itself. We might find it helpful and agreeable to know the inciting psychological reason, but we can still view a suicide and recognize it as intentional without knowing the premeditating causes.

[–]73553r4c7 4 points5 points ago

How can you determine if something is done on purpose if you do not know the psychology behind it?

[–]Dereliction 0 points1 point ago

The same way you determine that it wasn't. Right? The issue here is that we're talking about animals, and we can't very well ask them. As a result, some situations are far more clear than others, but that's okay.

We don't need to be certain for cases surrounding the fringe--what's important is that we can start to identify instances that are clear, and then work back to the reasons for those cases.

A bear that we observe leaping off a cliff, as opposed to slipping from it, is a case of animal suicide, no matter what the psychology behind it may be. I think it's possible to make that statement absent the initiating psychological cause. Leaping, as opposed to slipping, shows intent. That's enough to cite it as suicide, don't you think?

[–]73553r4c7 1 point2 points ago

No. Because it is only suicide if the bear intends to kill itself. You can never rule out the possibility that it didn't, as you say, because you can't very well ask it.

[–]buttnutts 0 points1 point ago

Amazing that people are downvoting you -- these are all valid points. There is a world of difference between self-harmful or dangerous activity which happens to result in death, and taking action with the express intent of ending one's life.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]grottohopper 0 points1 point ago

Again, it's obvious the bear bile is not medicine. However, until every practice and supplement that is considered part of traditional medicine has actually been reviewed for efficacy (and almost none of them actually have) then you can't make that judgement.

[–]im_not_a_penguin 13 points14 points ago

I didn't see any of the previous comments since they were deleted...

TCM is batshit insane. Most of the remedies, if not all, are based on religious dogma, because a few of their remedies work does not justify continuing a bad system. Something supposedly working because it is "hot" or "cold" , or that your organs aren't balanced you should eat something that as some elemental property. These beliefs mirrors some beliefs Europeans had before the Scientific revolution.

[–]darkdeeds6 4 points5 points ago

Why did grottohopper get so many downvotes? He is right, in a sense that many TCM herbal remedies works, although TCM theory itself has no scientific basis.

Certain western medicine also uses the same ingredients as TCM - for example, Tamiflu utilizes shikimic acid from Star Anise, which is used in TCM to treat Rheumatism for centuries.

Note that things like bile extraction are no longer accepted in mainstream TCM. Regions that have scientific regulations of TCM such as Hong Kong and Taiwan have strict guidelines on TCM herbal usage. TCM practitioners in HK can issue legally accepted Medical Certificates similar to Western doctors.

[–]lowrads 4 points5 points ago

It's unreliable anecdotal evidence. As the article states, this procedure makes the animal prone to infection.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]random_89123 1 point2 points ago

Nuh-uh, we're divine and stuff. We have soul things and will live forever and junk. Animals are just meat.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]luvcheez 6 points7 points ago

OHHH AWESOME TOPIC! I became OBSESSED with octopus and cuttlefish, and I remembered reading somewhere that if you have them as pets and don't stimulate their mind with interactions and puzzles, they will attempt to climb out of the water and let themselves dry out. suicide.

tldr:your octopus will kill itself if you don't play with it.

proof: http://www.tonmo.com/articles/octosuicide.php

[–]bedlamos[S] 1 point2 points ago

That is extremely interesting. I wonder if they are actually smart enough to realize they are being neglected, or some primal instinct tells them to just kill themselves since they no longer need to survive, as they are fed and interacted with daily.

[–]bioluminescentaussie 7 points8 points ago

There's a documentary called The Cove, about the dolphin trade in Japan, part of it is about Flipper, which was played by several dolphins. One of the dolphins was said to have committed suicide in the trainers arms by not taking her next breath. Perhaps it is a human condition though, as it only seems to appear in animals afflicted with humanitis. Wild animals aren't prone to it, it seems to be the animals who are in captivity that do it.

[–]enthusiastic_amateur 36 points37 points ago*

I am a Volunteer with Samaritans here in the UK.

When we talk to people who are feeling suicidal we often find that it is not one single event that has caused them to feel like they cannot cope with life, but more like a series of events that have taken their toll.

Take a look at the link - there is a simple model that describes what we term 'emotional health'.

At the top end of the scale, or just to the left is where most people are - at this point they have strength to cope with the knocks / crap stuff that happens. However a knock, like maybe losing your job, can cause a slight downward slide, this results in having less strength. If someone then experiences another knock, another downward slide occurs - leaving you with even less strength to cope. And so it goes on. It seems that for many people sliding down the scale happens a lot easier than fighting back up it.

When people are at the top end, or near it, it can be like driving a car at maybe 25 miles an hour - at this speed you are well able to take in everything happening around you, you can see shops that have a sale on, kids running down the street, the traffic lights ahead. We can cope with this easily. However, at the opposite end of the scale, it is more like driving at 100 / 120 MPH down a motorway - at this speed we get a tunnel vision type effect - we are concentrating hard on the lanes of traffic ahead, looking out for brake lights, cars changing lanes and not much else. It is the same with emotions, when people are in a low place it canbe that they only see all the crap stuff that has happened to them. It is all balled up, all the can see. It becomes overwhelming and with little strength left to cope it can seem like the e only escape from that mass of problems is to end their life.

http://www.samaritans.org/your_emotional_health.aspx

Edit

The following links back up my layman description. Please bear in mind, as a Volunteer I'm not a trained Counsellor, Psychologist etc!

https://dspace.gla.ac.uk/bitstream/1905/170/1/115.pdf

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273581100002X

The first is peer review work carried out by Glasgow Uni and the second is research into resilience...

Hope this backs up my thoughts.

[–]speedx5xracer 8 points9 points ago

It might not be scientific or technical but it is a pretty accurate lay explanation... (unlike @enthusiastic_amateur I am a trained mental health professional and I agree with the majority of this explanation)

[–]thelonious_pants -5 points-4 points ago

Your answer is far from scientific.

[–]enthusiastic_amateur 12 points13 points ago*

Oh, OK - is deletion in order?

Edit I thought rather than delete I would find a couple of papers that discuss 'Emotional Health' and Resilience that compliment my thoughts...

[–]justanotherhumanbein 19 points20 points ago

Please don't delete it your comment. I have often felt that way and I found your response both helpful and informative.

[–]Hristix 0 points1 point ago

Would it surprise you to believe that a lot of people who seem particularly unlucky generally just always make poor decisions? I've got ten dollars in my pocket. I go out and spend it on a nice meal, even though I have food at home. Two days later, I'm out of gas and don't have the money to get more. My car gets towed from the parking lot I pushed it into. I have no way to get home.

Finally I get all that resolved.

I just spent $100 on a Christmas present for my friend because I totally like him/her! Goddamn it, I'm out of gas again, why does bad shit always happen to me? :(

That wasn't me, just my style of writing, BTW. Anyway, bad things happen to everyone. But they generally only happen one after another to people that make shitty decisions. It's easy to make shitty decisions when you're depressed or just don't care, though.

[–]ronswansonfangirl 1 point2 points ago

Out of interest, how did you become a Samaritans volunteer, and what prompted you to make this decision?

[–]soupyshoesBehavioral Psychology|Human Language & Cognition|Suicide 14 points15 points ago*

There is a LOT of anecdotal evidence been put forward here as hard science. Suicide does NOT occur in animals, by definition.

The main problem here is that people are defining 'suicide' as an outcome, not a procedure: Modern definitions of suicide (eg Marsha Linehan's or Rory O'Connor's) require "a purposeful intent to cease consciousness." As such, agressive and self harmful behaviour often emerges in captive animals, but functionally this is self stimulation and lacks a willful intent to die, as animals cannot construct the verbal behavior necessary to do this. The best conceptual explanation for this I have seen is Hayes (1992), "Verbal relations, Time and Suicide", chapter 7 of Understanding Verbal Relations.

Similarly, the self harming behaviour (eg eye gouging) that emerges in many intellectually disabled and autistic populations and can lead to death isn't suicide, by definition. If you do a search for suicidality in the severely or profoundly mentally handicapped, you'll see that it doesn't happen.

This is also illustrated by the example of smoking: most people are aware that it leads to cancer and death, but if you die from lung cancer its not suicide because there was no willful intent to cease consciousness. ,As such, it is instead considered low-level deliberate self-harm.

Edit: My PhD is in the prediction of self-harm and suicide.

[–]flabbigans 26 points27 points ago

Suicide does NOT occur in animals, by definition.

What do you mean "by definition"? How do you know animals aren't capable of intentionally ending their lives?

As such, agressive and self harmful behaviour often emerges in captive animals, but functionally this is self stimulation and lacks a willful intent to die, as animals cannot construct the verbal behavior necessary to do this.

So because animals can't verbalize their intent, they are incapable of suicide? This is absurd. Willful intent doesn't necessarily require the capacity to verbalize that intent. Animals generally aren't capable of any speech, so I don't know why you'd expect them to be able to verbalize suicidal ideation.

[–]cognitive_science 10 points11 points ago

He seems to be subscribing into a strong interpretation of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in which the only way you can have a thought is if you can express it in language. This idea is not supported by any evidence, though.

[–]frogofthebucket 4 points5 points ago

I agree. I would like to see this clarified.

[–]jemyr 3 points4 points ago

Here's an interesting link about a doctor who thinks elephants can be mentally ill: http://andriankreye.com/elphe.html

[–]jemyr 0 points1 point ago

I guess the first question would be, does an animal understand the concept of death? I know that elephants have been seen ritualistically burying their dead (visiting gravesites, acknowledging the death of another elephant and covering the carcass with branches, screaming at the "burial"). Though I don't believe any other animal has been proven to have a death ritual. Elephants will kill themselves by standing on their trunks in order to asphyxiate. Some have done this in facilities where they are in recovery after abuse (so not currently in harm's way).

[–]kdellzAuditory Neuroscience 2 points3 points ago

Counseling psych?

[–]Banderbear 5 points6 points ago

This is really interesting, I have wondering about animal consciousness, and recently I'm starting to think that maybe some animals are more conscious of death - do you think that it's possible for an animal to wish harm on itself?

[–]Jimmy_Jolene 0 points1 point ago

What about people who were self mutilating and went overboard, would that still be considered a suicide? They weren't intent on dying, but it happened anyway and will be labeled a suicide.

[–]bedlamos[S] -1 points0 points ago

I don't want to sound rude, but if you could lean more towards factual science or educated guesses, rather than what if questions I could find much more use of that. To answer your question, yes it would be labeled as a suicide, but by definition the person would not have committed suicide.

[–]FlamedPotato 0 points1 point ago

It's impossible to assess whether or not an organism has a suicidal tendency due to the sole fact that we have no idea how the animal is feeling since there is no means to communicate with the animal. However, it is believed that emotions such as sorrow is felt in many other animals with a large capability of behaviour such as mammals, birds, etc, and if humans show suicidal behaviour, then there is a likely chance that AT LEAST one other species shows the same behaviour.

[–]RyeTheBread 2 points3 points ago

Animals CAN become suicidal. There is a virus called Borna virus that causes animals to injure themselves to the point of death. In 2009 scientists mapping the human genome discovered the Borna virus in the human genome and that it is theorized this retrovirus may likely be responsible for mental illness (like bi-polar disorder and schizophrenia). Our common simian ancestors were likely infected about 40 million years ago and the virus has now become a part of our DNA (similarly to the same virus that caused us to become placental mammalians).

It's highly likely that your suicidal thoughts are because of an ancient virus expressing itself in your brain.

Here are some interesting and easy-to-read articles about the topic:

"Borna Virus Discovered in the human DNA": http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/science/12paleo.html?pagewanted=all

"Viral Gene in Mammalian Reproduction": http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=viral-gene-appears-crucia

Borna Virus antibodies showing up in patients with mental illnesses: http://www.neurotransmitter.net/bornavirus.html

"Borna Disease": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borna_disease

[–]wolf156 0 points1 point ago

Flipper committed suicide.

[–]FBoaz 5 points6 points ago

Dolphins have been known to commit suicide. One of the flipper dolphins actually killed itself. I've seen several TILs about it.

[–]stephj 2 points3 points ago

I remember seeing that in The Cove. The trainer is convinced the dolphin killed herself.

[–]infsmwetrust 4 points5 points ago

What you're describing is suicidal ideation. It is extremely common in adolescents, even in those without depression or mental disorders.

Also, there is a difference between simple ideation and serious ideation. If these thoughts are bothering you, even if you have no desire to kill yourself, it wouldn't be a bad idea to see a therapist. Sometimes what's troubling is not the ideation itselfm but your thoughts and self-judgments about the ideation.

edit: didn't mean to imply that you were an adolescent, but that it was particularly prevalent in that population. Its prevalence is high in certain occupations, as well.

[–]junejuly92 2 points3 points ago

Do you have a source for suicidal ideation being extremely common in adolescents?

[–]infsmwetrust 4 points5 points ago*

Sorry this is old (from the '80s). I'll find a newer one for you in a bit.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1986.tb01013.x/full

Here's a newer one (more like 19-20%): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12222087

In certain populations (LGBT youth, those who engage in cutting/self-injurious bxs, etc.), the rate is over 50%.

Keep in mind that "moment in time" sampling is different from lifetime prevalence rates. That's why the numbers are all over the place, but I stand by my original comment that ideation can be considered "extremely common," and that ideation in itself is not a cause for concern.

[–]bedlamos[S] 1 point2 points ago

No harm done, no offence taken. I may not be an adolescent, but I am still a young person that has thoughts such as this, with which each comment I am coming closer to understanding. I appreciate the time you put in to your post!

[–]linuts 1 point2 points ago

Ric O'Barry, a/the Flipper trainer, believes that dolphins and whales have the ability: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/whales/interviews/obarry2.html

[–]tehpoorcollegegal 3 points4 points ago

Before anyone takes what O'Barry has to say with too much scientific weight, please keep in mind two things: his alumni is in film, not biology/psychology: (I can't find my citation on this anymore for some reason ._____. my apologies) and he has killed dolphins because he does not understand how to properly care for/rehabilitate them: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ole/news/news_061099.htm So I would take what he says regarding cetaceans with a very large grain of salt considering he has shown his lack of (solid/credible) knowledge more than once. I suppose everything else I have to include is anecdotal so I'm going to leave it out as per the subreddit rules.

[–]TheHolls 0 points1 point ago

He has anecdotal evidence concerning the topic of cetacean suicide, even if it isn't concrete. Given the pop-psychology nature things like brain scans are taking on, it seems this evidence might be as admissible as anything else. The specific source I saw this topic in is the documentary The Cove.

[–]tehpoorcollegegal -1 points0 points ago

But if you're going to give weight to anecdotes, then you need to question the credibility of said anecdotes because they do not have citations/any kind of check to ensure they're not a flat-out lie.

Take for example, your source, The Cove. Widely regarded as garbage in the industry surrounding cetaceans from my experience - here's a decent source which explains why. It's emotional hype meant to drive you into supporting a cause without question, not a source of valid information which should be used for debate/as a source for anecdata.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uSjCFWjRmgM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KllJxpznagY

See what I mean? Which is why it's best to avoid anecdotal information in a scientific discussion - and especially in r/science where it simply isn't allowed in the first place. Anybody can claim anything, and that simply isn't what verifiable fact and science are all about. :/

[–]kingsway8605 1 point2 points ago

I have heard stories if dolphins and whales in captivity exhibiting self harm behaviors.

[–]CaptObviousOnTheJob 0 points1 point ago

Lorises and chameleons are often claimed to commit suicide. Scientists claim that the folk belief about chameleons is related to the fact that their judgement is impaired by long droughts and that they fall to their deaths as a result of careless climbing, not intention. Lorises are thought by some to kill themselves under extreme stress but I don't know what the alternative explanations are.

[–]toxiccrusader 0 points1 point ago

People get suicidal thoughts because it relieves stress a little bit. It makes them feel like they have options opposed to feeling like you have no control over circumstances life gives you. I'm not sure if animals commit suicide, but I'm sure given the right amount of stress, their brain could "short circuit" making their will to live a lot weaker.

[–]emwtur 0 points1 point ago

oh my god, - the goldfish just jumped out of the window.

[–]Dialaninja 0 points1 point ago

I recommend Emile durkheim's Le Suicide. He breaks down the different forms off suicide, and posits his thesis as to why people kill themselves (at least in certain parts of europe) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_(book)

His view is sociological, finding that suicide occurs as a result of social pressures.

[–]cookmybook 0 points1 point ago

Why neglect the semicolon?

[–]topcat512 0 points1 point ago

zoo animals that aren't treated well can become suicidal and depressed.

[–]trevorvalentine 0 points1 point ago

I once sprayed a scorpion with Raid and while it was writhing in pain, it started to stab itself in the head. It was horrifying--the thought that I didn't cause a quick death, and the thought that an insect had the mental capacity to think to kill itself to end its suffering.

[–]Hyatt03 0 points1 point ago

I once saw a chicken commit suicide...

[–]Stewmeat95 1 point2 points ago

Dolphins in captivity have committed suicide before, they have to consciously think about breathing, its not automatic. So they can just choose to not breath again. The first dolphins kept at seaworld i believe committed suicide.

watch this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyRLD2PmWHw

[–]givetake 1 point2 points ago

Domesticated rabbits are known to exhibit signs of depression so severe that it can kill them. Ignorant people buy baby bunnies for their kids at easter not realizing what a responsibility they are and relegate the rabbit to a solitary confinement in a cage outside with infrequent "play" time that usually consists of being chased and terrified by young children.

Neglected rabbits experience decreased or irregular appetite due to depression from such a lifestyle and often die because of their fragile digestive systems (they are lagomorphs and rely on a fine balance of cecotropes in their digestive tract) where a neglected pet with a heartier digestive system (like a dog or a cat) may keep on surviving, given enough food and water.

[–]brianwilsonsdad 1 point2 points ago

I see a lot of questions about how animal psychology relates to that of a human. For anyone with these types of questions, might I recommend Temple Grandin's "Animals in Translation"? She addresses this and many other questions about why animal brains work the way they do. But you don't have to take my word for it!

[–]ComaBerenices 1 point2 points ago

I second this. The woman is a master on animal psychology. She changed many things for the (slightly) better in industrial farming actually.

[–]That_Dog_Wont_Hunt -1 points0 points ago

Coming up next: Can bees think?

A new study indicates that no, they cannot.

[–]NotGonnaPayYou 0 points1 point ago

Isn't the fact that we as humans have an enormous pre-frontal cortex an explanation for such thoughts? As far as I remember, it helps us simulate trial-and-error scenarios without having to actually conduct them (resulting in "insight"-learning, see Wolfgang Köhlers research on primates) which is an ability that seems quite rare (if at all present) in animals. That way we can simulate killing ourselves and later evaluate the potential outcome (in case of a depressive patient this would be a positive evaluation), which is obviously not possible if you actually "try it out". That leaves the question why greater apes do not commit suicide. Well first of all, their prefontal cortex - which is also responsible for social interaction etc. - is not as dominat as ours. It is believed by some researches that what we call "consciousness" is a side-effect of this cognitive system. As a consequence, some researchers belief that humans are the only animals who know that they will die eventually. You could also consider this a prerequisite for suicidal thoughts.

[–]bedlamos[S] 1 point2 points ago

Interesting, this would bring on the thought that the only reason we are conscious is because at some point in history our pre-frontal cortex either evolved or mutated. Calling consciousness a side-effect is actually frightening to me for some reason, and makes me feel like more of an animal [I know humans are animals] and less like an arrogant "human being".

[–]NotGonnaPayYou 0 points1 point ago

It makes sense, though. It makes sense for a higher social being to be able to differentiate between the "self" and the "others". Also, the simulation-aspect is extremel beneficial. If you think about it: Most of the time you "think", you are actually testing out various things to do, to say in conversations, to write on the internet, and so on. If you didn't do that, your social environment might look quite ... different

[–]bedlamos[S] 1 point2 points ago

Thanks for all the thoughtful comments, I have a better understanding now. This is a very interesting topic!

[–]secretgspot 0 points1 point ago

it's been heard of terminally sick dogs walk into traffic in order to be killed

[–]ClysmiC 1 point2 points ago

I remember a story where a bear killed itself and its cub after being mistreated at a bile farm

http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Asia/Story/A1Story20110805-292947.html

[–]scottie_holtsclaw 0 points1 point ago

Has anyone mentioned Overtoun Bridge yet? it's a bridge where dogs have been known to leap to their death, several of dogs have done this.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtoun_House

[–]Tr3v3336 0 points1 point ago

[–]Votesareno 0 points1 point ago

Can happen to animals but since they don't have media/journalists nor politicians nor religion to fuck with their minds it's much more rare.

(worded snide but making a real point)

[–]ptcjstc1984 0 points1 point ago

We experience suicidal thoughts when death seems preferable to life. It may be an experience or a lifetime of them that pushes us over the edge, but suicidal thoughts can also be caused by chemical imbalances in the brain.

I think it's normal to think about suicide, but far fewer actually attempt to to kill themselves. Something holds them back. Hope perhaps, or fear of pain, or fear of how death will impact loved ones.

We all value different things of course, and I personally think it's important to place our value on those things which are more intangible and longer-lasting. Things that take more to lose. We have to recognize our own faults and make a real effort to improve as human beings, while realizing that we'll never be perfect.

I've thought of suicide on and off throughout my life, moreso recently. I just lost my 48-year old mother to cancer and my father has abused his access to her life insurance policy, spending it on trivial and unimportant things and attempting to buy the love of manipulative women with it. In the end though, you have to free yourself from any guilt or blame--especially for things that aren't your fault.

Thinking about the reason(s) for your sadness can do a lot to clarify the situation, but you must be willing to deal with what you find. You can't lie to yourself. Once you can recognize the cause of your distress, you can start addressing the problem.

If suicidal thoughts are occurring without any trigger, then perhaps you are experiencing an odd chemical imbalance in your brain. Lack of certain nutrients can lead to some very surprising depression. I'm a big advocate of curing ailments naturally, and would suggest that you look into some of the herbs and such that are available.

We can't always control what happens to us, but we can control how we react to it, or what we take into our bodies to perhaps address the issue in this case.

[–]dakami 0 points1 point ago

One of the tests for antidepressants involves having a rat hold himself on a cord, seeing how long he can last before he falls into the water. The longer he holds on for dear life, the more he's showing a will to live vs. assumption of hopelessness.

Scientists tend to get really data averse when it comes to reasonable models of consciousness for animals, because, well, we do pretty awful things to them. It's probably the largest blind spot in all of science, to be honest.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

A lot of studies show a link between clinical depression in humans and off-kilter hormone levels, specifically with dopamine, norepinephrine, seratonin, and cortisol. Not that hormones are the only cause of depression/ suicidal behavior, but they do play a role.

http://www.allaboutdepression.com/cau_02.html

Environmental factors are big too. Stress and extremely negative situations obviously contribute.

[–]benjash -2 points-1 points ago*

I think there are lots of different reasons for suicidal thoughts. I was raised as a Jehovahs Witness and found that over the years I got more and more depressed.

I was very secretive about my feelings i was having. So it took a long time to realise that i was very depressed, self harming and having constant suicidal thoughts.

These things ranged from thinking about harming myself, actually burning + cutting myself, considering driving into oncoming traffic, planning in my head suicids & giving myself a deadline for suicide.

I was in a very hopeless situation where my reality did not match the reality what my community was dictating. Years of psychological trauma, brainwashing and bullying had come to a head. It was like life became had no hope. I had grinding impulse to get out / simply not exist.

It was only when my work colleaque noticed cuts, questioned me and sent me to the doctor.

The doctors had me do this test: http://www.nhs.uk/Tools/Documents/Depression%20self%20assessment.htm

Eventually i was on anti-depressants, counselling and had a number to ring if i thought I was going to do anything bad. I could of taken time of work but chose to stay in work.

About 5 years later I now have nothing to be remotely sad about. The treatment worked mainly becuase I removed what was causing the problems. I've not been a jw for 4 years now and never felt better.

I think once you give up on living its very hard to think clearly.

Ive seen animals on TV that have been abused or kept captive, sometimes they give up on living and stop eating or bang there heads against walls. So i think i animals can kill themselves or at least give up on living.

Humans are easily "mentally" held captive and sometimes they cannot free themselves. Which creates a reality where they want to die. Which is ashame.

Existentialism has cool thought on this, which helped me a lot. Where existing creates a sort of dread or angst. I had lots of feelings like that even when i was happy. I was scared of being happy knowing it would be bad again.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism

[–]Transubstantive 1 point2 points ago

Animals in captivity have been known to kill their young and then themselves if the conditions are horrible enough. Bears in Indonesia held in captivity and harvested for their bile are a stark example of this.

[–]darenas -1 points0 points ago

Look up Ostrich....some animals are just prone to suicide. Out of stupidity or just I don't know. People get suicidal because they think death is easier than their current situation. I for one, think that what happens after death is unknown, and would rather live a crappy life still existing than the possibility of something strange after death. Imagine, what if people after death are forced to listen to a Bieber song on repeat for an eternity...life is better :D Son of a...after I typed this out I saw it was in science...awaits deletion

[–]chiefboo 0 points1 point ago

I'd like to know why people don't get suicidal thoughts more often. If you're completely honest with yourself and are a logical person then you cannot come up with a logical, non-subjective reason that life is worth living.

Most people live because they experience enough good that its worth suffering the bad, but in the end what does it really matter? Our lives are so insignificant in the grand scheme of things. We are but a blip in the universe's history and yet we push that fact into the back of our minds and focus on our technological advancements and say, "it matters. It has to."

In the end everyone's belief that their lives matter are going to be as ridiculous and illogical as everyone's belief in God.

[–]whapz 0 points1 point ago

Word.

[–]inahc 0 points1 point ago

if it doesn't matter, though, then you may as well enjoy the fun parts of life. "you come from nothing, you're going back to nothing. what have you lost? nothing!"

also, technically the answer to your question is, people aren't more suicidal because suicidal people are less likely to pass on their genes (it's kinda hard to have sex when you're dead). so the ones who can find (or make up) a reason to keep going are able to perpetuate their genes more effectively.

[–]chiefboo 0 points1 point ago

I've been dealing with depression since I was about 12. I'm 26 now and I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea of never experiencing any happiness so long as I never had to deal with the sadness or negativity.

I've experienced wonderful feelings. I've loved and been loved and am loved; but I do not enjoy life and would rather have never existed. Suicide isn't really an option either, because I understand that killing myself would effectively be killing a part of those who love me and possibly even pushing them towards the same shitty existence I live now. Life is a trap in that regard.

"people aren't more suicidal because suicidal people are less likely to pass on their genes."

Is there a "suicide" gene?

"the ones who make up a reason..."

This is my point and something I've been wanting to express to the Atheist community of Reddit who make fun of and belittle people of faith:

You're reason for living is as silly as people's faith in a higher being. You are not more intelligent or worthy of anything than anyone else.

[–]somethingmeaningful 0 points1 point ago

Lemmings!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]__circle -1 points0 points ago

call 911 or 999 depending on which country you are in.

I think this qualifies for the dumbest statement ever made on Reddit. do you really believe he doesn't know the number of the emergency services in his country? And do you really think that the only two numbers used world-wide are "911" and "99" For instance, it's "000" where I live.

[–][deleted] ago*

[deleted]

[–]ronswansonfangirl 2 points3 points ago

I'm not disagreeing with you or correcting you, but as someone who works at London Zoo, I can it's incredibly irresponsible for zoos to keep animals with specific needs in those kinds of conditions. It's unlikely that they would be kept in these conditions at any kind of respected zoo (although there are plenty of awful ones across the globe), as a high mortality rate can mean that you are prohibited from participating in breeding programmes, and are unlikely to receive animals from other zoos.

Edit:

For example, our tarsiers are in a special exhibit for nocturnal animals

[–]panerli 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, I guess first world countries take better care of zoo animals. Do your Tarsiers commit suicide by the way?

[–]ronswansonfangirl 0 points1 point ago

Not that I've ever heard of, and although animal deaths usually aren't widely publicised (for obvious reasons), you do hear about them through the grape vine.

[–]ComaBerenices 0 points1 point ago

Just thought I'd let you know I love London Zoo :) I go there as often as I can. Big ornithology fan especially and really love those open bird enclosures. I made friends with a nice lady who worked there but unfortunately then never found her on facebook.. You should do an AMA!

[–]ronswansonfangirl 0 points1 point ago

I love it too! Everyone who works there is absolutely lovely, from the executives right down to the volunteers. Do you remember her name? I might be able to find her for you :)

[–]nalilito -5 points-4 points ago

I am no expert in suicide but when I was a kid, about 15 years ago, I saw a monkey, on TV, who committed suicide all by himself, inside a cage.

What's weird is that the/these monkey/monkies have white foam in their mouth and likely dies from suffocation, without any kind of assistance - no idea how they do that. The monkeys only do this if they sense that they will be killed for food. They can also usually see their fellow monkeys being skinned.

I'm from the Philippines and I saw it from the discontinued show "Magandang Gabi Bayan" (roughly translates to "Good Evening Country/Nation" ) which has many environmental episodes just like BBC.

They have very interesting subjects like king cobra catchers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au-nO2p4EaQ. Half of the show is very unscientific (like subjects about ghosts, conspiracy theories, ghosts, exorcism, etc) unlike BBC narrators who mentions lots of facts rather than just narrate. But I saw what I saw.

Someone mentioned about tarsiers but I have zero knowledge about them.

[–]i_love_history 0 points1 point ago

I am no expert in suicide but when I was a kid, about 15 years ago, I saw a monkey, on TV, who committed suicide all by himself, inside a cage.

Three Swiss banks create $70 million fund for Holocaust survivors on this day 15 years ago.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Anzai 2 points3 points ago

That's only suicide if going over the top of the trenches in WW1 was also suicide.

Even if the bee knew that it would kill it, which I doubt it does, death is not its intention.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]ComaBerenices 0 points1 point ago

I have stumbled across many accounts of animals displaying signs of grief. Lots of info of that online and unsurprisingly many from cat and dog-owners.