this post was submitted on
40 points (72% like it)
64 up votes 24 down votes
all 56 comments

[–]ceol_ 19 points20 points ago

You should also learn when it's appropriate to play Devil's advocate. Going into a thread in, say, /r/funny with the intent to argue will only hurt the site further.

[–]charitablemisanthrop 7 points8 points ago

You're right. There is a time and a place for debate and advocacy of the devil. Different situations and different groups of people all have different norms, and that should always be taken into consideration. For instance, it might not be the best idea to play devil's advocate in a circlejerk thread, but in a thread where someone makes a strong argument or moral stand, then it would be appropriate. And if the other person can't argue agreeably, then just leave it.

[–]verdammt[S] 0 points1 point ago

I mean this mostly for places like r/atheism

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points ago

Reddit is too far gone. You know what happens now if you try to argue for the sake of the argument? You get immediately dismissed as a troll. Once your comment score hits -1, it will continue to drop. I don't think people even read things with a negative score, they just go right to the downvote button.

[–]ZorbaTHut 10 points11 points ago

I constantly argue things for the sake of the argument, and it's extremely rare for me to end up with negative points. I've had more than one comment recover from a negative score.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]CrossingTheT -1 points0 points ago

I want to test your theory. I downvoted you to 0. If you downvote yourself, you will be at -2.

From there, I suggest that we will see your post continue to be downvoted even though your thoughts are organized.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]CrossingTheT -1 points0 points ago

Now we wait.

[–]rdilla -2 points-1 points ago

catfight!

[–]Monoscuit 0 points1 point ago

There is one problem with this: the entire notion of what constitutes "organized thought" is subjective. Same with the voting system. Some people only upvote comments or threads that provide "oranized thought" while some people upvote content that challenges them or makes them laugh. Still others base voting on other criteria. In the end, no single person can say voting reflects "x" until everyone agrees to that definition and puts it into practice.

So maybe you have a negative karma score on this comment because your thoughts are disorganized. Or maybe its because the only people who read it were disappointed you didn't say anything about BDSM porn.

[–]13143 11 points12 points ago

Why not just unsub from the trashy circlejerk reddits and focus on the small communities? Some of the best reddit moments I've had have been in ~1000 members communities. I don't even bother commenting in the big reddits anymore.

[–]tksocratic 4 points5 points ago

Hmm I'd be game but I suspect there would be far too many mismatches:

"No, what about - "

BAM 800 word essay.

"Ummm okay... good points but..."

BAM "n00b!"

:(

Maybe a dedicated "debatehoning" reddit?

[–]blackstar9000 6 points7 points ago

Try /r/gue or /r/tmbr.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points ago

Ok, I'll start by playing the devil's advocate against this thread.

I don't agree with you. Of the whole pool of human beings, only a relatively small fraction are capable of rational and/or independent thought. Because, lets face it, thinking takes energy and most people aren't willing to use up that energy on thinking.

Therefore, in any setting where people are given a bit of freedom to do what they want, they will stick to the same repetitive activities that they already know are rewarding for them. Looking at pictures of cats, participating in pun thread (I did nazi that coming) and so on. This isn't a characteristic of reddit, it's a characteristic of human nature. The majority of people will rather watch a soap opera, or jersey shore or whatever it is people watch now rather than for instance educated themselves on a new subject, or trying to look at a familiar subject from a different perspective. Reddit is just one of many entertainment options one has when he wants to burn his time.

So to put things into perspective, I'll translate your view into the pre-internet era. People shouldn't be watching Who wants to be a millionaire / The big brother / Soap operas! They should be doing that requires them to actually use their brain and which I personally aprove of! Lets poke our noses into their lives and convince them they should be more like us!

TL,DR: Unsubscribe from the subreddits you don't like. You don't go in there and they don't come in here.

[–]verdammt[S] 1 point2 points ago

Damn. That put shit into perspective.

[–]tksocratic -1 points0 points ago

DA

Because, lets face it, thinking takes energy and most people aren't willing to use up that energy on thinking.

Well while this is a truism for any one time, if the period looked at is ~1 year, the percentages would almost certainly shift so that the people who did not attempt to stretch their horizons at all would be in the minority.

Therefore, in any setting where people are given a bit of freedom to do what they want, they will stick to the same repetitive activities that they already know are rewarding for them.

Subject to the fallacy of hedonism. They will do it until they get bored of it, and at that time look to move on - possibly onto the next variant of entertainment, but also possibly by searching for "deeper" content, which is to be had in reddits such as this one.

Lets poke our noses into their lives and convince them they should be more like us!

Good point. However, if it is not direct interference and is more passive study to determine how best to guide someone when they decide to enter into one's sphere of interest, then it is more a matter of being able to convince them they should be more like us when they poke their noses into our lives... Which seems to me to be far less presumptuous.

TL,DR: Prepare your defenses, because they will come here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

When they come here they'll be looking for the same things as us.

[–]hRfaslTmEkAdFjaSiMdz 0 points1 point ago

the fascists have taken over Reddit. . . i agree somewhat with your post and your solution is good enough

[–]rounder421 6 points7 points ago

As long as Reddit adheres to its voting philosophy, there will be no devil's advocate, nor a healthy discussion. Because of Reddit's fascination with karma, be it comment or link, the only things that will get upvoted are hivemind approved ideas. Reddiquette does not work; never has and never will. It's a systemic problem with the voting/karma system, that I don't think will ever be overcome.

[–]appleseed1234 6 points7 points ago

Reddiquette does not work; never has and never will.

Bullshit. I was late to the scene and even I remember a time when Reddiquette was held in high regard. It doesn't work because half the users of this site don't know what it is. There's no prompt, no introduction, you just register and immediately jump into the garbage on the front page with no clear idea of where to go.

[–]old_po_blu_collar 6 points7 points ago

agreed, I've collected a couple of links I'm going to start posting to any new redditor I find, maybe it will help some:

new to reddit? http://i.imgur.com/znnRc.jpg

http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2011/03/01/the-new-users-guide-to-reddit/

http://metareddit.com/

[–]rounder421 1 point2 points ago

Maybe so, but as a redditor of 3 years, you have much more older experience to work off of. As I have only been here ~8 months, my experience, even with smaller subreddits, is that the hivemind does not appreciate anyone straying from 'the path' even to play devil's advocate.

[–]g33n 0 points1 point ago

You're sort of right. The carrot is Reddiquette, but without a stick of fierce moderation there's no incentive to learn or follow it. Plus, the design of any website will influence the content and mentalities of its users... this is something I've been wrestling with for some time.

I think the requirements for any regulated community include a mechanism for maintaining the original community standards and inculturating new members. Reddiquette was meant to be the community standards document, but other than typing, grammar, spelling, and some basic standards of politeness, there's not much that can be said to be reddit-specific cultural aspects.

[–]essjay24 0 points1 point ago

Shouldn't the moderation come from the downvotes? And it's a problem where many places on the internet are Like and Dislike, not Relevant and not Relevant.

I know when I was new here that it felt weird to downvote "me too" posts that added nothing to the discussion, yet upvote posts that I disagreed with.

It's a different kind of place than most are used to.

[–]g33n 2 points3 points ago

Something like 80% of users don't downvote. The system has some structural flaws - if there's no mechanism of bringing new users into the culture of the site as a whole, or if there's no culture to speak of, then voting is going to fall to lowest common denominator over time as long as the site continues to experience three digit growth year over year.

[–]g33n 1 point2 points ago

I forgot another point I was thinking. A problem with the arrows - on the main page, up and down mean like and dislike, whereas on comment pages they mean, in theory at least, contributes to discussion or doesn't. But these two meanings use the same graphic, which means that voting is always going to trend toward like and dislike!

[–]hRfaslTmEkAdFjaSiMdz 0 points1 point ago

agreed. this place needs to be brought down, we need a new site with a new form of voting... some new system that will allow for more freedom of thought.

[–]Yorn 2 points3 points ago*

I think you're all going to hate me for this, but...

I've been using Google News for my news lately. Reddit isn't a site where I can come to learn anything anymore. Even my favorite subreddits are starting to suck. It's like a brain drain to everyone to either yhacker or that other one - hubski? :/

[–]shadowshoe 1 point2 points ago

I think a lot of us have been feeling this. That's why more and more people are migrating to the True- subreddits and other similar havens of people who actually want to learn.

[–]Yorn 4 points5 points ago

While I support the notion of "True" isn't that just a hack for what should really be taking place? Shouldn't it be built in that there are two sections for every subreddit? The "LOLzy" side and the "zOMG super serial" side?

Maybe Reddit should have left and right buttons just like the up and downs that send posts and comments to the "informative, persuasive, and entertainment" sections, which users can then filter out or put their own weights on?

[–]lazydictionary 1 point2 points ago

Actually even TrueReddit sucks now. You should look at the upvote/downvote scores of comments. It's sickening, they specifically ask to only downvote comments that detract from the discussion, yet every comment is dowvote 10's of times.

[–]shadowshoe 0 points1 point ago

I have only been a redditor for a few months, so I don't know what it used to be like. From my perspective, TrueReddit is doing pretty well. Can you point me to any resources that would illustrate for me what it used to be like?

[–]DublinBen 1 point2 points ago

Archive.org wayback machine.

[–]shadowshoe 0 points1 point ago

Thanks.

[–]Popular-Uprising- 3 points4 points ago

But didn't Star Trek prove that emotions are just as important as logic? That stuffy, humorless guy with the pointy ears was such a nerd and he loved logic.

[–]JohnKeel 3 points4 points ago

I sincerely hope that this is just double-devil's-advocation.

[–]verdammt[S] 0 points1 point ago

Oh and I just want to clarify that I am guilty of both of those currently.

Just take a look at my comment history.

[–]Rynaxel 6 points7 points ago*

Don't worry, it's pretty hard to not fall in to those two categories in a community where it is usually typical. The problem is most Redditors don't want critical analysis anymore, they want quick information which will adhere to their perceptions and for it to be widely accepted(upvoted) in the community to help them feel better about it. The /r/atheism community doesn't want to discuss arguments anymore, they want to link meme-garbage and Facebook posts. /r/politics doesn't want to discuss political analysis, they want to post links about how republicans are trying to collapse the country and Obama is failing them.

Nothing's going to be able to come in and save the Reddit community, because the sections of the Reddit community which are still good wholesome beings who care about discussion and sharing of ideas and information already exist in the form of the RepublicofReddit, TheoryOfReddit, AskScience/AskAcademia/etc and Truegaming/TrueReddit/etc. SRS tried to branch out into the community and discuss with them why sexual innuendos pertaining to underaged girls are not funny, but the community felt as though their "free speech" was being violated and lashed back out, so SRS just gave up and decided to force people to listen instead.

The point is, the good of the community already exists in small select islands and that is likely where it will reside until the next migration.

I apologize for the harsh tone of this post, but I really have lost a lot of faith in the abilities of this community over the past year, and I'm not sure I'm going to see it recover.

Edit: I think playing devil's advocate will only work in communities where stimulating and logical discussion is standard.

[–]shadowshoe 2 points3 points ago

^ This here! Rather than fighting an uphill battle trying to fight against the masses taking over the popular subreddits, it is possible to find what you want in the smaller enclaves that Rynaxel mentioned.

[–]Zazie_Lavender 0 points1 point ago

Well, I certainly play the DA whenever I can. No point in being a DA in the middle of a circlejerk though unless you have allies and *lots of them. *.

But that doesn't mean one shouldn't try to be a DA. All over the Internet, when one plays DA... You are often dismissed as a troll at first. The trick is to not give up or let that accusation derail you from your argument.

[–]de-inspired -1 points0 points ago

It worked!

And by worked I mean totally failed. Probably my fault. Just thought I'd show an example in action from the fiery bowels of the emotionally reactive.

[–]g33n 0 points1 point ago

I started a reddit just yesterday that I was thinking could act as a place to dissect irrational arguments and make them stronger, or something. I'm not entirely clear on what vision I had—if it's going to be /bestof for bad/good argument, /SRS for backing up logical arguments getting downvoted, /theoryofX for endless rationality circlejerking...

I kind of have a hybrid vision that I don't really have time to flesh out, but I'll post this and suggest that if there's interest maybe this ship can set sail wherever some community wishes to take it.

[–]viborg 1 point2 points ago

Emotions are a part of every debate, whether you admit it or not. Everyone's political beliefs have some emotional component, and you can't just logically decide to cut out the emotional aspect of your beliefs, because they are so fundamental to your entire belief system. I believe this pattern applies equally well to all of our beliefs, not just the political.

[–]hideyomudkipz 0 points1 point ago

I can agree that reddit has become quite a circlejerk, but, unlike other websites, reddit users have the tools to look back and critique the content of the website. A site like 9gag and by extension facebook only allows for positive reinforcement, which is why the top comments on 9gag are always the same, people who question the establishment gain less momentum. However, reddit has so many tools to keep this in check, voting (up and down), self posts, even r/circlejerk and r/theoryofreddit help users analyze the site as a medium and improve its quality. I can reference Canv.as as well as being very down to earth about when it is becoming a circlejerk.

[–]Levitz 0 points1 point ago

The problem is that, by definition, not belonging to the hivemind will get you less upvotes than doing so, users don't care about the matter, they don't care about discussion, they do care about what they think, instead of upvoting inspiring or thoughtful comments, they upvote whatever they agree with and downvote whatever they dont, as if it was the "I like" button from facebook.

In the Woody Harrelson IAMA he has downovtes IN ANSWERED QUESTIONS, how the HELL does that happen?

In a AskReddit post titled "We tend to be an open-minded bunch. But what would make you disappointed in your real or hypothetical children? Be completely honest." people take offense for things such as racism or homophobia, even if it's exactly the kind of answer to expect in such a thread.

The vote system has gone completely corrupt in reddit, things that are worth to be seen should be the ones upvoted, instead, people upvote things they like to see, sometimes those aren't the same.

[–]funknut 1 point2 points ago

They need to eliminate the down arrow, and rely on the report button for inappropriate posts. It's too bad that unreasonable abuse of the down arrow has the immediate effect of muting a user in a particular subreddit in the way that a several minute time limit is placed on the frequency of posts after receiving negative karma in a subreddit. Downvotes are for comments that contribute nothing to the discussion. Do not downvote comments simply because you disagree.

[–]hRfaslTmEkAdFjaSiMdz 0 points1 point ago

agreed. Reddit won't change this though, and to be fair I suppose it's not such a big deal... mostly just extremely irritating when it does happen. And actually kind of eye opening to the fact that most people haven't got a clue!! Or is it just most people who decide to post and/or do the downvote game? I think this problem extends past Reddit and becomes a rather serious philosophical issue. I think Plato said that people really shouldn't be given too much power, it would be disastrous even. And that is what is happening here, people feel they have that power... it has some very good applications, and at the same time has proven to be disastrous for those whose minds explore further realms.

at this point, arguing with the average Redditor is truly as bad as trying to argue with your extended family about politics or religion... futile, infuriating, and for anyone who is on the 'right' side... depressing and taxing.

[–]wauter 1 point2 points ago

STOP. GENERALIZING. TRUTHS. ABOUT. THE. BIG. SUBREDDITS.

I personally think reddit is in better shape than ever, as there are now enough people to make a reddit purely about my favorite cities, obscure hobbies, etc... (It used to be just self, programming and politics in the ole days)

I am getting really sick of these everybody is doing it wrong, except for me/us of course posts. Is r/theoryofreddit so bad, to name one obvious example?

[–]verdammt[S] 0 points1 point ago

Refer to #1 in my post.

[–]WillToHave 0 points1 point ago

Regression to the mean.

[–]culturalelitist 1 point2 points ago

I think that this is a pretty bad idea. Can you imagine if this became widespread? How annoying would it be to never know if the people you were talking to on Reddit were being genuine or not? And there's the fact that many of the people I see playing "devil's advocate" on Reddit now are just trying to make excuses for their shitty arguments after someone else comes along and destroys them. The only way I could see this being a good thing is if someone created a novelty account called "DevilsAdvocate" or something similar and started spreading it all over Reddit. What Reddit really needs is more people who are willing to stand against the hivemind and defend what they genuinely believe in without fear of being shouted down.

[–]BeelzebubsBarrister -5 points-4 points ago

You called?

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]verdammt[S] 0 points1 point ago

Exactly the type of comment I was talking about.

[–]de-inspired 0 points1 point ago

Your TL;DR is almost the same length as your original angry comment.

TL;DR y u mad bro?