this post was submitted on
24 points (80% like it)
32 up votes 8 down votes
all 50 comments

[–]silouan 16 points17 points ago*

Just a thought: When Christ tells people "Your faith has saved you" and "Your faith has made you whole," he's using the exact same sentence: ἡ πίστις σου σέσωκέν σε.

That verb, sozo and its related noun sotiria apply to: rescuing someone from danger, preserving them in the midst of danger, bringing about health and soundness. Peter writes that we who now have faith expect to arrive at a goal: that our souls be saved. James writes to Christians that the word, if implanted in us, is able to save our souls. They aren't talking about crossing some invisible line between "going to hell" and "going to heaven." They're talking about the actual state of our heart and soul.

Related to this action of healing and preservation is Paul's counsel that our minds need to be renewed. David sings, "He restores my soul" and "Unite my heart to fear Your name."

Our English words "heal," "whole" and "holy" are all cognates (tiresome language nerd references on demand). In Greek, sos (safe) is the root word of sophronismos which is used to mean "self-discipline" but comes from root words for a whole or safe mind.

Christ talks about the eye as a lamp. If the eye of your heart is darkened with wounds and passions, and your attention is fragmented, shattered and distracted amid a thousand sensations and thoughts, then your need is to be made whole. Restored to health, and restored to relationship with people and with God.

For Greek-speakers, that's sotiria - what the Bible calls salvation.

[–]minedom 17 points18 points ago

This is beautiful. The goal of being saved, imo, is not about simply going to heaven. It is seeing the beauty of a Christ who died not to save you only, but to set you free, so that you can have life. Not merely eternal life, but abundant life. Well said.

[–]hagerty9009 2 points3 points ago

More and more this is the message and image of Christ I'm getting.

I know there are other issues with the movie, but I kind of like the way Mel Gibson portrayed the actual Passion part in The Passion of the Christ. Seeing the severity of Christ's wounds, whether that is how it actually was or not, really drives home Isaiah 53:4-6. We come to Him broken and he makes us whole because he breaks Himself for us. It's less Jesus taking a bullet for us and more Jesus forsaking His own health to make sure we recover from our ailments.

[–]jmachol 0 points1 point ago

So what would have been the goal of being saved before Christ? Or was it impossible to be saved before Christ? Honest question. Educate me! :)

[–]minedom 2 points3 points ago

Exactly as the guy above me said. People who trusted God before Christ were saved because of this trust. As Peter said of Abraham and all those who trusted in God before Christ:

"All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance, admitting that they were foreigners and strangers on earth." Hebrews 11:13

And Jesus said:

“Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” John 8:56

And to really hammer it home ;) Paul said:

"It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith." Romans 4:13

[–]jswan1790 1 point2 points ago

I believe so. Jesus spoke about the Bosom of Abraham, a part of sheol (if I am correct), where those that trusted God before Christ came went when they died. You have Elijah and Enoch being removed from the earth as well.

[–]MarlovianDiscosophia 6 points7 points ago

Almost Eastern Orthodox. It's about restoring the image of God within us, theosis.

[–]SubversiveLove 5 points6 points ago

Salvation; gr. sōtēría. From sṓzō. Definition: I save, heal, preserve, rescue.

Salvation is not about heaven. It's about healing.

[–]tavarner17 2 points3 points ago

The goal is a relationship with your Creator, and Heaven comes as a bonus.

[–]trovocation 0 points1 point ago

Not a bonus, but a result of being with your Creator. For from him all good things flow.

[–]pygreg 2 points3 points ago

I don't think being "saved" is really about going to Heaven at all. God doesn't really talk about taking people up to some tripped out paradise all that often. Mostly he seems concerned with keeping his promise to renew all things by making a new heavens and a new Earth, and how His followers can live in such a way that spreads that renewal even now.

[–]TheIcelander 3 points4 points ago

You say "primal human instincts" like it's a bad thing. I happen to enjoy mine quite a bit. My sexual instinct, my instinct to eat, my instinct to love my family, my instinct to hate injustice. Why are these things to be liberated from?

[–]lemonpjb 0 points1 point ago

Because humans can reasons. It is what sets us apart from the rest of the animal kingdom. We are given the choice to rise above mere instinct.

[–]achingchangchong 0 points1 point ago

These are all good "instincts." To us, they're part of the image of God that's within you. However, sin and human brokenness has corrupted these instincts. The sexual instinct of intimacy and procreation has been corrupted by sexual abuse and assault. The instinct to eat is corrupted by gluttony and obesity-related disease. The instinct to love your family is corrupted by broken homes and domestic abuse. The instinct to oppose injustice is corrupted by desire to marginalize, control, and oppress others.

These instincts have been corrupted in the world, but they are not permanently corrupted. Jesus redeems us and our human natures, and he redeems the instincts of our nature to reconcile us with God.

[–]TheIcelander 0 points1 point ago

Jesus redeems us and our human natures, and he redeems the instincts of our nature to reconcile us with God.

I find this highly suspect considering Christians are sometimes the worst offenders. In fact, the atheist prison population is significantly lower than the Christian one. I mean, we can't be that much better at not getting caught.

[–]achingchangchong 0 points1 point ago

It's a long, arduous process (basically the Orthodox idea of theosis), not the flip of a switch to a binary state.

You probably shouldn't use the prison argument in the future. I don't think it's productive to think of ourselves as opposing "teams" and compare who's morally superior and then one side "wins". The number of professing atheists in the general population is smaller, so professing atheist prisoners of is smaller too.

[–]TheIcelander 0 points1 point ago

It's a long, arduous process (basically the Orthodox idea of theosis), not the flip of a switch to a binary state.

Which is great, except that it still implies that non-believers are incapable of achieving this state. Which, of course, is part of the exclusivity of Christian doctrine

I don't think it's productive to think of ourselves as opposing "teams" and compare who's morally superior and then one side "wins".

This would be easy if Christians didn't insist they were morally superior.

The number of professing atheists in the general population is smaller, so professing atheist prisoners of is smaller too.

Yes, but the ratio of atheists to believers in prison is much smaller than the general population. Stats from 1997 put the percentage of atheists in prison at around .2%

[–]achingchangchong 0 points1 point ago

You aren't seriously offering prison numbers as evidence of morality, are you? Prison is an awfully low bar to clear to avoid immorality.

[–]TheIcelander 0 points1 point ago

So what does it say that there are more Christians than atheists as a proportion of the prison population?

[–]achingchangchong 0 points1 point ago

Almost nothing, because there are so many confounding socioeconomic and cultural factors. So what if there's a correlation? It doesn't mean there's causation.

[–]TheIcelander 0 points1 point ago

Wouldn't morality trump socioeconomic and cultural factors? If Christianity truly made people more moral, wouldn't they not commit crimes in the first place?

[–]achingchangchong 0 points1 point ago

I think this is crossing over to r/debatereligion territory, so I'll reiterate that following Jesus is not a magic spell or an instant transformation. It is a lifelong process.

[–]partofaplan2[S] 1 point2 points ago

And what about when those instincts run out of control?

[–]TheIcelander 1 point2 points ago

I'd rather have them and have to maintain control than lose them entirely. I'd stop being human, and I love being human.

And I realize I forgot a few: The instinct to explore, the instinct to imagine, the instinct to create, the instinct to cooperate, the instinct to make friends.

[–]partofaplan2[S] 1 point2 points ago

My thought is not that you quit them, but that you're enlightened to control them on a higher human plane...like a kickstart to your evolution. However, the original point was that when those instincts do run out of control, often people get hurt, then they hurt others and so on. What Christ saves us from is being affected by that cycle.

[–]TheIcelander 0 points1 point ago

My thought is not that you quit them

My thought is that we cease to exist, and they don't happen anymore.

But that's all we seem to have is thoughts. There's no evidence of any of it.

[–]partofaplan2[S] 0 points1 point ago

That could happen to. There's more evidence to suggest we cease all brain function. But in this life, I find it an interesting thought that we might be able to continue transcending on the evolutionary chain, with or without God. Maybe God helps. Maybe he doesn't, if he doesn't exist.

[–]baptist1611 0 points1 point ago

Salvation and Sanctification

Salvation != Sanctification

Jude 1:23 And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

[–]silouan 5 points6 points ago

Salvation != Sanctification

Interesting. What makes you say that?

[–]baptist1611 -1 points0 points ago

When you get saved do you cease from all sin? No of course not. We get saved when we we "confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."

However sanctification is different. That is a daily process of removing sin from your life and aligning yourself with the Scriptures. Notice how sanctification is preached to believers and listed separately from redemption.

1 Thessalonians 4:4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour;

1 Corinthians 1:30 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

Ephesians 4:24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

1 Peter 1:14 As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:

[–]silouan 1 point2 points ago

When you get saved do you cease from all sin?

If you're still captive to sin, then how can you say you've been saved/healed/delivered/rescued from your sins? To say i've been saved from my sins when obviously I haven't would be like saying I've been healed from cancer while the tumors are still growing in my body.

However sanctification is different.

How so?

You're defining sanctification and salvation but you're using your own definitions. You're the sola-scriptura guy, so if scripture doesn't contrast salvation with sanctification, then you shouldn't either, should you?

[–]pcsurfer -1 points0 points ago

salvation has nothing to do with a persons actions but christ's actions... THAT'S the good news, what Jesus did not what i do!

but while we're in the imperfect body/mind/spirit and in the current world (like a betrothed bride, having the title of a new family but not yet in that union) we still commit sin. Rom 7.

sanctification is dieing you sinful desires. Rom 6 Matt 18

[–]silouan 2 points3 points ago

Sanctus means holy. So sanctification means becoming holy. Right?

I don't see anywhere in the Bible that says sanctification is not salvation, or that it is "dying to your sinful desires" as you describe it.

[–]partofaplan2[S] 3 points4 points ago

You do a lot of prooftexting.

[–]baptist1611 0 points1 point ago

The power is in God's words not mine.

[–]partyfapplan -3 points-2 points ago

Preach it brother! As brother Jude said, we need to save those filthy, wretched sinners from the fire! Their flesh is disgusting and tainted by sin. And for those who don't repent, they will smoke like a fattened hog on a spit! They'll get what's comin' to them!

[–]PotatoOrgy 0 points1 point ago

Nice!

[–]danzor9755 0 points1 point ago

It's about knowing your creator and being reconciled to him, which in turn means eternity with him.

[–]TheHadMatter 1 point2 points ago

both really. one is kind of the bi product of the other i guess.

[–]fledgling_theologian 0 points1 point ago

Thomas Aquinas' soteriology and sacramental theology are on board with your basic intuition. The power of the cross is what "heals" us, restoring us to full human stature from the broken condition we've inherited since the fall of our First Parents. The sacraments then become the signs and gestures that connect us to the great healing/forgiving power of the cross.

Having been saved from the depths of sin and death, we can now grow as we ought, live as we ought, and love as we ought--as human beings, restored by Christ to right relation with God and creation. With the sacraments at hand, we are able to strive for the fullness of humanity, the life abundant (Jn 10:10), the hundredfold now(Mk 10:31), and complete joy(Jn 15:11).

Being saved is just the beginning...

[–]allanpopa 0 points1 point ago

Being saved is never a completed event, it is always a process. That much is clear from the language used by the Apostle Paul in describing salvation. What we are saved from is something a little more obscure, there appears to be a consistency in theological musings on the topic in that we are saved from evil but how that really pans out is ambiguous at best.

Either way, imagining salvation as a process of liberating humankind from evil appears to be the most common way we may be able to come to terms with it today. Participating in this process, this New Creation, is generally spoken of as living in love, peace, justice and forgiveness. This certainly is how we can imagine evil being conquered - how we can imagine salvation from evil as being incarnated.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

That is a difficult question. I would not say the goal is to get saved from Hell or get to go to Heaven. And I'm sure everyone has already seen the prooftexts enough times that whether you believe or disbelieve them or interpret them differently there does seem to be texts which talk about a real place of eternal suffering and a real place of eternal paradise.

But is that to be our goal upon accepting Christ? I think that there is more emphasis in scriptures on getting right with God, and yes, doing good things. But really, as far as Heaven goes, they seemed to put the emphasis on living right, but that does not render the doctrine irrelevant either.

[–]peter_j_ 0 points1 point ago

No, it's about glorifying God.

[–]Waking_Phoenix 0 points1 point ago

I believe the latter: 14 Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery. [Hebrews 2|ESV]

You got it, man. And don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

They will tell you it's all about escaping Hell and running off to Heaven but when you read the Bible you realize that's not what Jesus does or what the focus is, and from all condemnation there is a purpose. Read Jeremiah. It shows those cycles very well.

[–]trovocation 0 points1 point ago

I think about it as wanting to be in relationship with God. That is what has to determine our descriptions of 'heaven' and 'salvation'. Heaven is a place where God lives among his people in perfect relationship. Salvation is reconciliation to God, being saved from the horror that is to be separated from God. Therefore, hell is a place we adopt when we reject salvation. We'd rather go to hell than to be with God. That is the underlying motivation between either outcome: death and heaven are consequences on the side.

[–]Duke_Newcombe 0 points1 point ago

Yes.

[–]ebfulch 1 point2 points ago

These days I find that I could completely remove even the concept of "heaven" and my theology of salvation would remain in tact. And even salvation is a difficult term for me because of some of the ways it's been used (saved from hell, etc.). I have a faith (active trust...key ACTIVE) in Christ because I believe Christ is the one who will redeem our world, bringing his kingdom to earth in order to remake our world. So, in my mind, salvation is more about earth than it is about "heaven." "Thy Kingdom come, they will be done, ON EARTH as it is in heaven." That's our prayer as Christians.

[–]letter_ten -1 points0 points ago

When we're called to Heaven, we'll have the privelege to worship our God with no distractions or human desires. Our bodies will be glorified with His holy splendor. Our joy will be made complete. Our yearning will be satisfied. In short the effects of sin will be no more. Beautiful indeed. Great insight, partofaplan2 :)

[–]GoMustard -1 points0 points ago

The question that ought preoccupy our faithful contemplation is not whether we are saved; but rather what it is we've been saved for.

[–]captainhaddock 2 points3 points ago

Saved from, I should think. The word is basically synonymous with 'rescue', and this was a powerful message during the Crisis of the Third Century when Christianity spread rapidly across the Roman empire amidst political chaos and economic collapse.

It's a little harder for modern people in affluent countries to see the need for rescue, which is why evangelism tends to focus on salesmanship – trying to convince people they need the product. The turn-or-burn attitude is the ultimate example of this terrible approach.